I think many of us have more lenses than what would be neccessary for effective practice of photography. I, for one, certainly do.
However, the question I have is: how bad is FM at being over-geared ?
One somewhat simplistic approach would be to see how many lenses we own.
The poll rules:
* Only lenses equipped with the Canon EF mount count, including third party ones (and ZE lenses as well).
* Teleconverters and extension tubes do not count.
* Only fully functioning lenses count.
* Lens duplicates count too.
Once more, please read my lips: "Count only lenses which are equipped with the EF(S) mount".
If we start counting other lens stuff, that would get us beyond this forum's scope, into the alternative waters, where they seem to be doing little else but trying to turn a sow's ear into a silk purse.
Counting only lenses that were originally manufactured with an EF mount, I'm an "ARTIST/CRAFTSMAN" --- but it's a troubling sign of Alt Dementia that I had to dig through my records to check this...
mpmendenhall wrote:
Counting only lenses that were originally manufactured with an EF mount, I'm an "ARTIST/CRAFTSMAN" --- but it's a troubling sign of Alt Dementia that I had to dig through my records to check this...
Self recognition of one's problem places them on a healing path.
Level - Know It All soon to be Hacker
11 lenses; one is an EF-S, the 10-22 is a real lens and I stand by this fact
3 of these are entry level zooms, 20-35, 28-90 and 75-300 that will soon be sold
If alt and older FD glass were to be included in this pool...does lens Whore provide an image for ya, and I won't even talk bodies n parts, bags, supports and or filter/filter systems
PetKal wrote:
Jerry, as soon as we met I could tell you had it in you.
I'm a collector he said, okay a whore n proud of it, until the old gearz are sold off, I buy more and ...shite
I need a drink, Tequila please; straight, I'm hardcore addicted to gearz...I admit it OKAY
