M635_Guy wrote:
At least provide some context, thoughts...something. I can find the link all over the internet.
Well goody for you. Then I guess you didn't have to read this thread, nor look at the link. Instead, you just have to whine about about someone posting a harmless link on your hallowed ground.
What part of, '"Canon owners are not allowed to express their views of the Nikon Forum", don't you understand
I can't waste any more of my time on this thread, so goodbye for now. Thanks to the mature Nikonians that have expressed their interest in the link I provided.
Imagemaster wrote:
What part of, '"Canon owners are not allowed to express their views of the Nikon Forum", don't you understand
I think you mis-typed there...
If you'd expressed some views, I wouldn't have any issue at all.
Imagemaster wrote:
I can't waste any more of my time on this thread, so goodbye for now. Thanks to the mature Nikonians that have expressed their interest in the link I provided.
The link you "provided" was pretty much useless. If you haven't noticed, Fred tends to hop into the various forums with industry news of note.
I guess my point is that if I were to wander over to the Canon forum to post a link about a new product, say the 70-200 f/4, I would at least have put some kind of comment to get a positive or interesting conversation going - e.g. "The Nikon side of the house is glad to finally have a comparable product - thoughts opionions about the best uses for this lens?"
...or SOMETHING...
Feb 03, 2013 at 08:55 PM
Andre Labonte Offline • • • • • • Upload & Sell: Off
binary visions wrote:
You guys are so focused on Nikon that you can't conceive of being interested in what's offered by the photographic market at large?
That's what the Canon forum is for ... if I'm interested in seeing what Canon has, I go there.
Archive 2013 · Canon's 200-400 competitor
