dkperez Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.27 #3 · Dot-Tune: Autofocus Fine Tuning in under 5 minutes | |
the sun came out late this afternoon, so I scampered over to the local river where there were a LOT of geese hanging out. I tried to set up APPROXIMATELY the same distance I was last weekend (different place, different birds) and do some anecdotal testing......
I Started at zero, shot, marked, then went to +2, +4, +6, +8, +10, and +12. Then went to -2, -4, -6, -8, and -10.
Shot several images at each setting, using AFC and my normal aperture mode, but at 5.6, wide open for the 500 with a 1.4X on it.
According to the approximate focus distance I was about 55 meters from my subjects, which I think is a bit further than I was, but everyone says the distance thing on all the cameras is wonky.
In any event, in my testing, I can't tell any visible difference even at 200% on a 30" monitor between the +4 and +8 settings. By +10 the subject starts to look soft where I was focusing, but the birds BEHIND (maybe a foot back) are sharper - still soft, but not as soft.
On the other end, it's perceptibly softer at zero and as I go into the -2, -4, and so on it get back to the water in front being sharp and the subject being visibly soft.
I'm going to have to look critically, but I suspect I'll end up somewhere between +4 and +6. On some images, the +4 seems to be sharper, but the difference is minute if I'm even able to actually see it....
In any case, this method appears to work, even on such a trying setup as a very long lens.
One of these days I'll have to do the same thing with my 90mm macro 'cause sometimes it doesn't seem as sharp as it should and I'm not sure where it's focusing.
It would also be interesting to try my Nikon 70-200 with extension tube since that's when things get really critical 'cause DOF is so shallow. I'm almost always at 200mm and have a 36mm extension tube on when photographing butterflies and it would be good to have an adjustment value for when I'm doing that.
|