sjms wrote:
we here are referring to still frame rate transfers. it's only part of the equation. soon enough we'll have 4K video being pushed off. progress, ain't it grand.
Yes, that too will increase the need for higher transfer rates.
Either CFast or XQD is fine with me, but I'm not doing both and also CF and SD for other bodies. Ideally there would be a mini/micro XQD or CFast for small devices, be SDxx is too firmly entrenched.
we shall see. but CFast 2.0 is new out of the gate (and of course faster but and XQD 2 is coming). this is and it always will be the next wave in a technology marketing war. it will just keep coming to keep us consuming. the biggest advantage is to the moving image industry.
15Bit wrote:
Expensive. I'm sure prices will drop over time, but it won't be easy to get a foothold in an already packed market segment at $300 for 32Gb. And it's not like the current tech is seriously lacking in performance for most users.
Ideally there would be a mini/micro XQD or CFast for small devices, be SDxx is too firmly entrenched.
