-tons of shots (like the epic 29) are tilted to the right. I see none tilted to the left. Not that it matters, just found it odd.
-20-22 seem almost like a different processing style. I like both styles, but a bit more consistency might be nice?
-9 & 19 are possibly a bit dark?
-The high amount of clarity in 27 detracts a bit from the cute factor of what they are doing.
(had to scrape the bottom a bit to figure out anything to critique, really strong set mike)
perhaps maybe to much saturation and orange going on...
I like the new processing.. or the improved processing but just be careful not to overdo it.
Your to good to screw it up with shoddy / overdone processing ... keep it real
Of the two sets you posted today Mike this one is the clear winner, well done and the PP is spot on but don't push it any further. As to nits you really need to go back and look at 22 and 24B. There is way too much flesh being pushed around by the dress that they could almost be frontal shots. Absolutely not your fault but give your pretty bride a break and smooth out the skin a bit.
Glad to see you back posting. I enjoy looking at your work. And this set is well done. My only improvement would be the images look a bit too overdone. Contrast/saturation maybe? Not 100% sure but is a well done set otherwise. Thanks for posting.
Images looks great. My only recommendation would be to get some nice hangers and keep a few in the car. Even the Mini has enough space to keep a few hangers.
Bed, Bath, and Beyond has nice off-white satin ones. IKEA has 8-packs of nice wood ones for like $5.
Okay, it took some work but I found one that I thought I could give you feedback on that could have been better. 9 looks like a posed shot following the sequence in 7 and 8. But she's turned away from the light so her face is completely in shadow. If you turned them 90 degrees, the indirect natural light would light up both their faces nicely.
Love the set. I might leave out or edit 22. That shoulder squish / back fat is pretty distracting. fwiw I think the area in focus of 22 vs the second pic in 24 makes a huge difference.
dgillyerek wrote:
Love the set. I might leave out or edit 22. That shoulder squish / back fat is pretty distracting. fwiw I think the area in focus of 22 vs the second pic in 24 makes a huge difference.
+1
Being a woman I wouldn't care for this pic at all ONLY cause of the squish. I love the shot other wise.. My fave is the groomsmen! Great work!
