fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              5              7              11       12       end
  

Archive 2012 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?

  
 
snapsy
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #1 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


Sneakyracer wrote:
True, the 5D3 sensor improved quite a bit in very high iso performance but more so in long exposures and I believe the sensor cleaning is MUCH more effective. On top of that the 5D3 is a much faster camera. But yea, the sensor is NOT groundbreaking in the least. Just more refined.

IMO the advances Canon made in PDAF for the 1DX/5DM3 are more ground breaking than the sensor advances represented in the D800, particularly because the D800 is just a spin of the D7000 sensor. I think the 5DM3's PDAF improvements have more utility in general use than the D800's sensor advantages, plus the shortcomings of the 5DM3's base ISO noise performance issues are easier to work around than an AF miss.



Aug 25, 2012 at 07:01 PM
rscheffler
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #2 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


+1

I consider the 5DIII a smart move by Canon as a camera that is much more useful to a wider range of photographers than the D800. Just the forum chatter will have you believe everyone wants/needs 36MP and give the impression that Canon made a huge blunder.

Having been burned somewhat by the 1DIII affair, and considering the IV only a mild evolutionary AF improvement, it's the 5DIII/1DX AF that got me off the fence about the 1DX. I'm also very happy Canon intro'd it in the 5DIII first an a lot of people immediately confirmed that it was an improved and reliable system. I feel it provides a solid base for the high demands a >36MP sensor will place on future AF systems.



Aug 25, 2012 at 07:07 PM
snapsy
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #3 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


Monito wrote:
Because Canon has long ago demonstrated 50 Mpx full frame sensors and 120 Mpx APS-H (1.3x) sensors. So it is just a matter of timing to get the right combination of sensor quality, given the technology push coming from Sonikon / Nikony, and the right combination of price points and production costs and economies of scale.


I don't think anyone doubts Canon can produce one-off proof-of-concept sensor designs. The issue is whether they have the fabrication resources/investments to mass produce them cost effectively with adequate yields.



Aug 25, 2012 at 07:18 PM
Sneakyracer
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #4 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


rscheffler wrote:
I feel it provides a solid base for the high demands a >36MP sensor will place on future AF systems.


Oh yeah, I agree, a very solid base indeed for any sensor. The 5D3 does everything very well. Its the most well rounded DSLR Canon has made to date. The resolution is more than enough for most people. Event photographers certainly do not want more and non-profesional users except maybe landcape photogs and the top end commercial shooters. Canon has also been somewhat quietly upgrading their lens line. Quite a few outresolve the current sensors so they are ready for more MP.



Aug 25, 2012 at 07:24 PM
Jeffrey
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #5 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


rscheffler wrote:
I feel it provides a solid base for the high demands a >36MP sensor will place on future AF systems.



Sorry, don't see the relationship between pixel count and AF system function.



Aug 25, 2012 at 09:13 PM
n0b0
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #6 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


Sven Jeppesen wrote:
Of course Canon could have more than 22MP. But not any sensor like some people here suggested. That would double the MP every second year since the first one. Then it would be a 100+MP sensor


Did you read the post I quoted? Of course you didn't, otherwise you'd understand what I was trying to say. Well, just so you know, that's the context in which I replied.

If Canon wanted to, they do have the ability to double the MP every 2 years. Their super high MP sensor prototypes proves that. The thing is, unlike CPU chips market, it's unnecessary and even bad for business.



Aug 25, 2012 at 09:49 PM
woos
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #7 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


snapsy wrote:
I don't think anyone doubts Canon can produce one-off proof-of-concept sensor designs. The issue is whether they have the fabrication resources/investments to mass produce them cost effectively with adequate yields.


Yeah, some comments:

I've read that the 120mp sensor would not be competitive, image quality wise, with today's sensors, and that it involved some massive trade offs... What I recall was that it involved having four pixels per amp, instead of having one at each photo site. I'm not sure if that's true, however...just random crap I've heard, lol.

Now then, I DON'T believe Canon's fab tech is limiting the megapixel count at this point. Reasoning: The S100. Also, the 18mp crop sensors. I believe Canon's current fab tech can handle approx 30-45mp full frame sensors without issue.

I'm thinking that the bigger issue for Canon isn't the pixels themselves (which are excellent, some of the best if not the best in the business)...but the associated stuff.

Sony has the exmor tech (digital CDS) which involves having column analog to digital converters and other digital logic on the chip. This vastly simplifies getting great DR and eliminating pattern noise. It also lets the analog portion of the chip (and maybe the whole thing, I don't know) run at a much much lower frequency...that further makes things easier...

The D4 chip, while not having digital CDS, has the analog to digital converters on the chip, as well. How many of them there are, I have no idea. While not as great of DR as the exmor chips, it has large DR advantage over the Canon method. It makes it easier to get that great DR. I dunno who makes the D4 chip, some say Renesas, I bet it is Toshiba, but who knows. Toshiba has great experience with mixing analog and digital logic on one chip.

Samsung's new 20mp sensor is the same way, on chip ADCs, and I believe, around 13 stops of DR at base ISO (similar to the D4). Samsung also has a lot of experience mixing analog and digital logic on one chip.

As far as I know, Canon has no experience mixing analog and digital logic on a sensor. Maybe someone has some inside info on this, if so that'd be awesome. Putting the analog to digital converters on the chip would make getting the higher DR a lot easier. Let's face it, a 45mp sensor with pattern noise and 11 stops of DR is not going to cut it. I believe Canon knows this. Can Canon's process handle mixed logic on a sensor? We don't know.

I believe Canon COULD get great DR out of their existing analog output sensor tech. However, it would probably cost a lot more and require real tight QC. The more read out channels you have the harder it is going to be, too. How many read channels are they going to need to get decent FPS from a 45mp sensor? How many will be needed to deliver a decent live view experience? Medium format digital delivers great DR, but their chips run slower and read out is much slower.

I'm sure Canon will find a way to deliver, though, one way or another.



Aug 26, 2012 at 12:28 AM
Sven Jeppesen
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #8 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


n0b0 wrote:
Did you read the post I quoted? Of course you didn't, otherwise you'd understand what I was trying to say. Well, just so you know, that's the context in which I replied.

If Canon wanted to, they do have the ability to double the MP every 2 years. Their super high MP sensor prototypes proves that. The thing is, unlike CPU chips market, it's unnecessary and even bad for business.


You don't need to be rude every time somebody have a different opinion than yours, And I have that. I don't belive Canon have the ability to double it every second year. And make it work in a camera like we know today. Prototypes is a different thing than the real ones that actually works good in cameras. And I don't belive they even have a prototype that works with those high MP numbers you suggest. The 11MP sensor in the 1Ds that was mentioned before is about 10 years. Today that would be a sensor that works and is 352 MP in a normal camera today. If they doubled it every second year



Aug 26, 2012 at 12:37 AM
retrofocus
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #9 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


rscheffler wrote:
+1

I consider the 5DIII a smart move by Canon as a camera that is much more useful to a wider range of photographers than the D800. Just the forum chatter will have you believe everyone wants/needs 36MP and give the impression that Canon made a huge blunder.


It is the same old discussion, but here the actual link which tells a different story:

Best sellers in DSLRs at Amazon (on 08/26/12):
http://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Camera-Photo-Digital-SLR-Cameras/zgbs/photo/3017941?tag=crf-20

rank No. 5: D800
rank No. 11: 5D MkII
rank No. 14: 5D MkIII

This confirms what I am seeing in my own - more limited in number of course - known circle of photographers: 3 upgraded to D800, 3 to 5D MkII, 1 to 5D MkIII. Admittedly the price difference between D800 and 5D MkIII also plays a role, not just the sensor difference.




Aug 26, 2012 at 12:54 AM
retrofocus
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #10 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


snapsy wrote:
IMO the advances Canon made in PDAF for the 1DX/5DM3 are more ground breaking than the sensor advances represented in the D800, particularly because the D800 is just a spin of the D7000 sensor. I think the 5DM3's PDAF improvements have more utility in general use than the D800's sensor advantages, plus the shortcomings of the 5DM3's base ISO noise performance issues are easier to work around than an AF miss.


I can see that for some - especially wedding and sports shooters - faster and more reliable AF is more important than resolution. Others like myself might disagree with the statement above. To me better sensor resolution is key, I rather compromise in fps. The AF difference between D800 and 5D MkIII is minimal and not a biggie. Others prefer better DR than sensor resolution - I never missed something regarding DR in my actual 5D II at "normal" ISO numbers. But photography has many shooting styles, so I see the near future in having two models parallel one for faster fps and one with improved MP sensor. Both of course can have the same well performing AF system.



Aug 26, 2012 at 01:06 AM
Ralph Conway
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #11 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


retrofocus wrote:
It is the same old discussion, but here the actual link which tells a different story:

Best sellers in DSLRs at Amazon (on 08/26/12):
http://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Camera-Photo-Digital-SLR-Cameras/zgbs/photo/3017941?tag=crf-20

rank No. 5: D800
rank No. 11: 5D MkII
rank No. 14: 5D MkIII

This confirms what I am seeing in my own - more limited in number of course - known circle of photographers: 3 upgraded to D800, 3 to 5D MkII, 1 to 5D MkIII. Admittedly the price difference between D800 and 5D MkIII also plays a role, not just the sensor difference.



Those numbers do not mean much. Or said else: It just tells us that more D800s are sold by Amazon than 5D IIIs. In this case that might be twice as much bodies or just 10 bodies more (from maybe thousends sold ones). If not those "numbers" are daily rates but totals. Who knows.

What I see limited on my own little circle of photographers: Two purchased 5D III nobody a D800. Does that mean none are sold?

On the other hand it is very easy to explain more sold D800s for now and the next couple of month I guess. It has not much to do with higher MP or better DR then other cameras offers. In opposite to Canon Nikon now first time after four years offers an affordable FF body with higher then second last generation (actual) 12 MP resolution to their customers. It needs some time and sales to get this hard lean Period compensated. Lets compare the sales numbers to each other in one or two years.

Ralph



Aug 26, 2012 at 02:10 AM
rscheffler
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #12 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


rscheffler wrote:
I feel it provides a solid base for the high demands a >36MP sensor will place on future AF systems.

Jeffrey wrote:
Sorry, don't see the relationship between pixel count and AF system function.


Higher resolution sensors require greater focus precision and consistency. What worked for 6, 8, 12MP is no guarantee for 30, 40, 50MP.



Aug 26, 2012 at 03:13 AM
n0b0
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #13 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


Sven Jeppesen wrote:
You don't need to be rude every time somebody have a different opinion than yours, And I have that. I don't belive Canon have the ability to double it every second year. And make it work in a camera like we know today. Prototypes is a different thing than the real ones that actually works good in cameras. And I don't belive they even have a prototype that works with those high MP numbers you suggest. The 11MP sensor in the 1Ds that was mentioned before is about 10 years. Today that would be a sensor that works and
...Show more

I don't have a problem with you disagreeing with me, my problem is I don't think you understood what I was saying.

I'm not talking about making the sensor work in a DSLR. Canon most likely doesn't have the technology to process all the data from a "352MP" sensor that can fit in a DSLR, they may not have lens technology that can match the high MP, and it may not be commercially viable, but that doesn't mean they can't make the super high MP sensor itself.

You see those small P&S sensors with 16MP? Canon does have the ability to build sensors with real tiny pixels. It's only a matter of manufacturing cost if they want to make a full frame version.

Heck, GPU manufacturers already use 28nm technology. That's WAY smaller than the 120MP APS-H prototype sensor Canon had a couple years ago.

To repeat gdanmitchell, you're naive if you think Canon can't make a super high MP sensor. Who knows what Canon engineers are cooking in their R&D labs.



Aug 26, 2012 at 03:17 AM
alundeb
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #14 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


Thinking that Canon is going to utilize the small sensor (S100) fabs for large sensors is naive.

They have the 18 MP APS-C sensor tech that could be scaled to FF.

The next sign of what Canon can produce in terms of high pixel density large sensors is going to be a 24 MP APS-C sensor. Then we can see how the performance stacks up against Sony's excellent 24 MP APS-C sensors, and if Canon really is hitting the limit or not.



Aug 26, 2012 at 04:41 AM
Lars Johnsson
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #15 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


alundeb wrote:
Thinking that Canon is going to utilize the small sensor (S100) fabs for large sensors is naive.



+1 yes very naive



Aug 26, 2012 at 08:16 AM
splathrop
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #16 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


snapsy: IMO the advances Canon made in PDAF for the 1DX/5DM3 are more ground breaking than the sensor advances represented in the D800, particularly because the D800 is just a spin of the D7000 sensor. I think the 5DM3's PDAF improvements have more utility in general use than the D800's sensor advantages, plus the shortcomings of the 5DM3's base ISO noise performance issues are easier to work around than an AF miss.

You wouldn't look foolish if you suggested that those advances represent a systematic approach designed to lay the groundwork for a more orderly and successful MP upgrade. My current assumption is that a Canon camera that combined ~45 MP, good low-noise dynamic range, and 5D III autofocus would be the last camera I would ever need—at least until I take up aerial reconnaissance. From a Canon marketing standpoint it would be a great platform to support long-term lens development and sales—which probably will turn out to be the only viable approach to the camera market once bodies approach broad practical perfection.



Aug 26, 2012 at 08:46 AM
Paul Gardner
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #17 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


A couple of op have evidently misread or misunderstood my 16 bit statement. The 16 bit is used to increase the Tonality of the dark end of the response. Look at the bits involved, also the statement it would slowdown the frame rate is accruate, BUT I also stated that the accecptable frame for landscape shooters is 1 frame every 2 seconds. Quit trying to make a PJ camera out of a landscape camera and go buy a PJ version. Example: 1DIII as opposed to a 1DSIII. Most landscape shooters don't give a rats A** about FPS. I've seen these PJ types in action. Their cameras sound like machine guns and they spray and pray. Hopefully Canon will go to S2 size someday or better yet 70MM.
Paul



Aug 26, 2012 at 09:33 AM
Sneakyracer
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #18 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


Paul Gardner wrote:
A couple of op have evidently misread or misunderstood my 16 bit statement. The 16 bit is used to increase the Tonality of the dark end of the response. Look at the bits involved, also the statement it would slowdown the frame rate is accruate, BUT I also stated that the accecptable frame for landscape shooters is 1 frame every 2 seconds. Quit trying to make a PJ camera out of a landscape camera and go buy a PJ version. Example: 1DIII as opposed to a 1DSIII. Most landscape shooters don't give a rats A** about FPS. I've seen
...Show more

Canon has clearly focused their recent DSLR products on PJ's/Wedding and Video Shooters. But they have released awesome lenses for Landscape / Architecture like the 17 and 24 II TS-E's and the 14L II. My guess is that a HIGH MP Canon DSLR is not far from being a reality.



Aug 26, 2012 at 09:42 AM
n0b0
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #19 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


alundeb wrote:
Thinking that Canon is going to utilize the small sensor (S100) fabs for large sensors is naive.

They have the 18 MP APS-C sensor tech that could be scaled to FF.

The next sign of what Canon can produce in terms of high pixel density large sensors is going to be a 24 MP APS-C sensor. Then we can see how the performance stacks up against Sony's excellent 24 MP APS-C sensors, and if Canon really is hitting the limit or not.


Never said that either. I only said Canon does have the technology to make super high MP sensor. Why is that so hard to accept?



Aug 26, 2012 at 09:48 AM
retrofocus
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #20 · High MP Canon DSLR on the rise?


Sneakyracer wrote:
Canon has clearly focused their recent DSLR products on PJ's/Wedding and Video Shooters. But they have released awesome lenses for Landscape / Architecture like the 17 and 24 II TS-E's and the 14L II. My guess is that a HIGH MP Canon DSLR is not far from being a reality.


+1 for both statements.



Aug 26, 2012 at 09:50 AM
1       2       3              5              7              11       12       end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              5              7              11       12       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account