Wow...simply wow. Utterly fantastic. Obviously a combination of two exposures (or possibly 3 given the 'sun' on the rocks) (at least, I don't think you can blur the water that much while keeping the stars still)...what were the shutter speeds? Simply beautiful.
Broke out my OM-D this morning for a little bit of macro shooting. Both with the Oly 60mm f/2.8.
Jman13 wrote:
Wow...simply wow. Utterly fantastic. Obviously a combination of two exposures (or possibly 3 given the 'sun' on the rocks) (at least, I don't think you can blur the water that much while keeping the stars still)...what were the shutter speeds? Simply beautiful.
Thanks, this photo is formed by two shots, one for the bottom and the cliff: 180s, ISO 800 ... and one for the sky: 30s, ISO 1600.
bobbytan wrote:
My first shoot with the OM-D. I am quite pleased with the camera and IQ on the whole. I think the file quality is pretty close to the 7D, with a slight edge going to the 7D. I do think the OM-D is a keeper ... but I am not ready to give up my FF Canon just yet.
First 3 images with the Panasonic Lumix 7-14mm. Portrait image with the M. Zuiko 45/1.8.
Jman13 wrote:
Wow...simply wow. Utterly fantastic. Obviously a combination of two exposures (or possibly 3 given the 'sun' on the rocks) (at least, I don't think you can blur the water that much while keeping the stars still)...what were the shutter speeds? Simply beautiful.
Broke out my OM-D this morning for a little bit of macro shooting. Both with the Oly 60mm f/2.8.
I dont' have the 60mm yet but looking at yours make me want one
She is a looker alright but I think the Nocticron is sexier!
Most people are unable to justify the high price of this lens, especially when the 45/1.8 is so compact and light, is only a 1/4 of the price, and can do 90% of what the Nocticron can do … but that extra 10% is worth the premium price if you ask me!
