fredmiranda.com
Login
This topic is in the 2012 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.

Archive 20125D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?

  
 
Greg Schneider
Offline
Details
p.9 #15D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
Other than the increased IS noise, has anyone noticed jitter in the VF? It is quite noticeable with the 800 and I'm afraid it might affect picture quality at anything other than fast shutter speeds. What a bummer!
May 04, 2012 at 07:53 AM
AGeoJO
Offline
Details
p.9 #25D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
Greg, see the previous page, please.
May 04, 2012 at 08:00 AM
Greg Schneider
Offline
Details
p.9 #35D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
Ah! That is reassuring. Next time I'll try to wade through all these posts a bit more closely
May 04, 2012 at 08:02 AM
dolina
Offline
Details
p.9 #45D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
Greg Schneider wrote:
Ah! That is reassuring. Next time I'll try to wade through all these posts a bit more closely

Greg I'd refrain from using either 200 or 800 with the 5D3 until Canon has given us a satisfactory solution to this issue.

I worry that Canon may not fix for free any damage resulting from normal use especially if the lens is out of warranty.

Knowing how much these gear cost I would assume repair bills will be as substantial.
May 04, 2012 at 09:04 AM
gpchase
Offline
Details
p.9 #55D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
I shot my daughters bball game Weds and turned off the IS...lens worked stellar..no issues or odd sounds.
May 04, 2012 at 11:13 AM
cheem
Offline
Details
p.9 #65D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
gpchase wrote:
I shot my daughters bball game Weds and turned off the IS...lens worked stellar..no issues or odd sounds.

I would imagine you can turn off IS or not use AI Servo, correct?
May 04, 2012 at 11:32 AM
vuilang
Offline
Details
p.9 #75D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
Is There any update/fix for the combo 5d3+200L yet?
May 04, 2012 at 11:41 AM
cheem
Offline
Details
p.9 #85D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
Nothing as of yet for the 200 or 800.
May 04, 2012 at 11:46 AM
pompo
Offline
Details
p.9 #95D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
I heard a very weird noise with the 5DIII + Canon 1.4x MII and 70-200 ISMII anyone noticed that? I actually turned IS off I was kinda worried...

Edited on May 04, 2012 at 10:02 PM · View previous versions
May 04, 2012 at 12:16 PM
cheem
Offline
Details
p.9 #105D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
There is a long thread on CR about the Kenko TC's not behaving all that well with the 5D3:
http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=4977.msg97911#msg97911
May 04, 2012 at 12:59 PM
Yakim Peled
Offline
Details
p.9 #115D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
How I wish I had this problem.....

Happy shooting,
Yakim.
May 04, 2012 at 05:01 PM
pcho
Offline
Details
p.9 #125D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
Yakim Peled wrote:
How I wish I had this problem.....

Happy shooting,
Yakim.


.....and Yakim I do have the problem funny enough I had a large event shoot and camera worked flawlessly.

Perry

Edited on May 04, 2012 at 05:39 PM · View previous versions
May 04, 2012 at 05:07 PM
AGeoJO
Offline
Details
p.9 #135D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
I just bought a used Kenko 1.4X 300 DG TC for the purpose of using it on an f/5.6 lens with 3 pins taped permanently and so far with and without the tape, I haven't encountered any issues. The 70-200mm Mark II and all other lenses that are compatible with the Canon 1.4X TC Mark III work great with the TC. That a Kenko product doesn't work on a Canon body shouldn't be Canon's problem but Canon should and will stand behind the product that bears their name/logo. I have used the 200mm and yes, the IS is louder than normal when it turns itself off but the function works just fine. If a situation calls for that lens to be used, I wouldn't hesitate to use it now but YMMV.
May 04, 2012 at 05:25 PM
James Taylor
Offline
Details
p.9 #145D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
So, again to be clear, if you put the 200L on the MKIII and DON'T turn on IS it will work just fine? What about AI Servo? Is that working correctly?

JT
May 04, 2012 at 05:36 PM
gpchase
Offline
Details
p.9 #155D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
Yes AI Servo still works
May 04, 2012 at 05:39 PM
AGeoJO
Offline
Details
p.9 #165D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
This is all my first hand experience and yours may not be exactly like this:

200mm f/2.0 lens - if you don't turn the IS on, then you won't hear the noise of the IS and it works for in the single shot mode and AI Servo. If you turn the IS on, for both single shot and AI Servo, I can hear a louder than normal only when the IS turns itself off but the IS works just fine and no jittery viewfinder whatsoever. I would use this lens if the situation calls for it.

800mm f/5.6 lens - I didn't bother turning the IS off when I tried it. In this focal length the IS is simply necessary. In single shot mode the IS works and the noise is a little bit louder than normal while being engaged and when it turns itself off. I would call the entire operation as "almost normal" just a little but louder. But the viewfinder becomes jittery in AI Servo mode although not in single shot mode. I haven't used my 800 since and I am waiting for Canon's solution on this. The resulting image is surprisingly normal, not blurry in other words, BTW.

Again, that's my experience and yours may not be the same.
May 04, 2012 at 05:47 PM
Yakim Peled
Offline
Details
p.9 #175D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
pcho wrote:
Yakim Peled wroteHow I wish I had this problem.....

Happy shooting,
Yakim.
.....and Yakim I do have the problem funny enough I had a large event shoot and camera worked flawlessly.

Perry


I envy you so much.

Happy shooting,
Yakim.
May 04, 2012 at 06:19 PM
pcho
Offline
Details
p.9 #185D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
pcho wrote:
Yakim Peled wroteHow I wish I had this problem.....

Happy shooting,
Yakim.
.....and Yakim I do have the problem funny enough I had a large event shoot and camera worked flawlessly.

Perry


There is only one issue with the camera. I have two press 2 buttons before I can move the focus points and in some instances I either have a missed shot or a shot not properly focused.
Still prefer my 1dsmklll with regards to the ease of use re focus points. Everthing else the 5dmklll is better

Perry
May 04, 2012 at 06:42 PM
Yakim Peled
Offline
Details
p.9 #195D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
pcho wrote:
pcho wrote
Yakim Peled wroteHow I wish I had this problem.....

Happy shooting,
Yakim.
.....and Yakim I do have the problem funny enough I had a large event shoot and camera worked flawlessly.

Perry
There is only one issue with the camera. I have two press 2 buttons before I can move the focus points and in some instances I either have a missed shot or a shot not properly focused.
Still prefer my 1dsmklll with regards to the ease of use re focus points. Everthing else the 5dmklll is better

Perry


Enough. You're killing me...

Happy shooting,
Yakim.
May 04, 2012 at 06:49 PM
stanj
Offline
Details
p.9 #205D Mark III + 200mm 2L = Weird/Loud IS?
pcho wrote:
There is only one issue with the camera. I have two press 2 buttons before I can move the focus points and in some instances I either have a missed shot or a shot not properly focused.


With custom configuration, you can make it just one button (and thus half as sucky). Switch the joystick to be "AF point direct", then all you need to do is _either_ tap the shutter _or_ the AF point selector button. Yes, still sucky, but only 50% sucky.

I miss the ability to use the back dial to select among the 8 outer and one center points - was insanely fast and precise.
May 04, 2012 at 08:51 PM
FM ForumsCanon ForumJoin Upload & Sell
  
 

You are not logged inLog inRegister