Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
p.36 #2Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
X-T2, 16-55mm f/2.8 at 55mm f2.8, ISO 200, 1/320s, Classic Chrome film simulation
 |
||
 |
||
|
Jul 04, 2017 at 04:28 PM
p.36 #3Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
starlights wrote:
X-T1 with 90mm
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/4ff7096c84ae8f3258f4baaa/52f3ecbfe4b0a5a45c143eed/593ee6e129687f1385cdd588/1497294684901/Web-SNXT3553-Edit.jpg
with 56mm
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/4ff7096c84ae8f3258f4baaa/52f3ecbfe4b0a5a45c143eed/593ee6d36a49638a906e02d6/1497294684783/Web-SNXT3543-Edit.jpg
Edited to correct the links.
Both are beautiful. I want to get one or the other as my one portrait lens. Which do you find to be better for subject isolation and sharpness?
Here's two of my son from this morning.
X-T1 with 90mm
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/4ff7096c84ae8f3258f4baaa/52f3ecbfe4b0a5a45c143eed/593ee6e129687f1385cdd588/1497294684901/Web-SNXT3553-Edit.jpg
with 56mm
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/4ff7096c84ae8f3258f4baaa/52f3ecbfe4b0a5a45c143eed/593ee6d36a49638a906e02d6/1497294684783/Web-SNXT3543-Edit.jpg
Edited to correct the links.
Both are beautiful. I want to get one or the other as my one portrait lens. Which do you find to be better for subject isolation and sharpness?
Here's two of my son from this morning.
 |
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
Jul 04, 2017 at 06:50 PM
p.36 #4Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Both lenses are great with isolation and sharpness, however I find 56 to be a lot more versatile and can be used in many situations. 90 may be sharper but requires higher SS and more specialized in its application. Make your choice based on the distance that you expect to shoot from. Cant go wrong with either. I would recommend 56.
Jul 04, 2017 at 09:07 PM
p.36 #5Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
July 4, 2017
Pittsburgh, PA
Fuji X-T2 / XF50-140
July 4, 2017 by SteelCityPhoto, on Flickr
July 4, 2017 by SteelCityPhoto, on Flickr
July 4, 2017 by SteelCityPhoto, on Flickr
July 4, 2017 by SteelCityPhoto, on Flickr
July 4, 2017 by SteelCityPhoto, on Flickr
Pittsburgh, PA
Fuji X-T2 / XF50-140
July 4, 2017 by SteelCityPhoto, on FlickrJuly 4, 2017 by SteelCityPhoto, on FlickrJuly 4, 2017 by SteelCityPhoto, on FlickrJuly 4, 2017 by SteelCityPhoto, on FlickrJuly 4, 2017 by SteelCityPhoto, on FlickrJul 05, 2017 at 12:40 AM
p.36 #6Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Niagara Falls from 40 stories up.
X-Pro2 + XF14/2.8
20170701 055b by Ron Smith, on Flickr
Edited on Jul 06, 2017 at 04:01 PM · View previous versions
X-Pro2 + XF14/2.8
20170701 055b by Ron Smith, on FlickrEdited on Jul 06, 2017 at 04:01 PM · View previous versions
Jul 05, 2017 at 05:51 AM
p.36 #7Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
starlights wrote:
Both lenses are great with isolation and sharpness, however I find 56 to be a lot more versatile and can be used in many situations. 90 may be sharper but requires higher SS and more specialized in its application. Make your choice based on the distance that you expect to shoot from. Cant go wrong with either. I would recommend 56.
Thanks. I've been partial to the 56mm since I'd like something with a smaller working distance. Funny because with Canon I preferred the 135mm to the 85mm. But oh well. I don't want to buy a bunch of lenses for the Fuji, so I think 56mm will be a good fit.
Both lenses are great with isolation and sharpness, however I find 56 to be a lot more versatile and can be used in many situations. 90 may be sharper but requires higher SS and more specialized in its application. Make your choice based on the distance that you expect to shoot from. Cant go wrong with either. I would recommend 56.
Thanks. I've been partial to the 56mm since I'd like something with a smaller working distance. Funny because with Canon I preferred the 135mm to the 85mm. But oh well. I don't want to buy a bunch of lenses for the Fuji, so I think 56mm will be a good fit.
Jul 05, 2017 at 11:45 AM
p.36 #8Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Ron,
That just about covers everything
What a great view I haven't been there since the mid 1970's
I heard it has changed a lot
Well Done
Reagan
That just about covers everything
What a great view I haven't been there since the mid 1970's
I heard it has changed a lot
Well Done
Reagan
Jul 05, 2017 at 01:35 PM
p.36 #9Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
4th of July pics from Fort Vancouver, WA. Picked a spot behind a massive oak for some visual interest.
 |
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
Jul 05, 2017 at 09:53 PM
|
p.36 #12Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
This guy is the winery dog at Whalebone Vineyard, in Paso Robles California. His job is to greet people and be friendly. He was great at both! X-T2 and 18-135.
Bentley at Whalebone by lennycarl08, on Flickr
Bentley at Whalebone by lennycarl08, on Flickr
Jul 06, 2017 at 06:51 PM
p.36 #13Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Spending the week in Steamboat Springs. Here are a few from this past week.
First 2 were with the 90mm and the rest were with the kit lens
First 2 were with the 90mm and the rest were with the kit lens
Jul 07, 2017 at 11:51 AM
p.36 #16Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Seabassius wrote:
^^^ that's some inviting water
Yep. Would love to chill near that lighthouse.
^^^ that's some inviting water
Yep. Would love to chill near that lighthouse.
Jul 07, 2017 at 02:19 PM
p.36 #17Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
yep the Caribbean Sea in Cozumel is absolutely unreal in color and how clear it is. It is incredible, you can see right through to the bottom everywhere, and the fish comes right to you, and actually bumps into you. It is incredible.
view from the top of the lighthouse
view from the top of the lighthouse
Jul 07, 2017 at 02:45 PM
p.36 #19Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
There is a number of discussions relating to Fuji X system and flashes. The Godox system is now almost fully on board, but I still have a number Nikon flashes so I had opted for the RoboShoot system as I don't have to invest in any other system for now. The RoboShoot works superbly with the XT2, but the X100F works with the SB 910 but not as reliable with the SB 700. The charm of the RoboShoot is that it is so easy and works up to -5/+5 EV compensation and HSS is automatically there.
Shot this morning with XT2 56/1.2 RoboShoot SB 700 HSS on manual exposure 1/500sec.
Shot this morning with XT2 56/1.2 RoboShoot SB 700 HSS on manual exposure 1/500sec.
 |
||
 |
||
|
Jul 07, 2017 at 09:03 PM
p.36 #20Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Another couple shots this afternoon of Marisa 
Late in the afternoon shot with the XT2 and 56 APD, RoboShoot with the SB 910 and softbox. Manual exposure at 1/1000 sec.
Almost forgot how much I love the 56 APD
Two different flash exp compensations -2 1/2 and -3 2/3 EV
Shot #1 and 2 post processed just Lr CC with camera std/provia profile.
Shot #3 in post processed via IXT, sharpening low. Lr CC with camera pro neg std profile. This is more subtle and may be better for portraits.
Shot #3 is my preference.
Late in the afternoon shot with the XT2 and 56 APD, RoboShoot with the SB 910 and softbox. Manual exposure at 1/1000 sec.Almost forgot how much I love the 56 APD
Two different flash exp compensations -2 1/2 and -3 2/3 EV
Shot #1 and 2 post processed just Lr CC with camera std/provia profile.
Shot #3 in post processed via IXT, sharpening low. Lr CC with camera pro neg std profile. This is more subtle and may be better for portraits.
Shot #3 is my preference.
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
Jul 08, 2017 at 01:31 AM