Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
p.31 #5Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
From my new to me Fuji X20. I love this little thing 
Jun 16, 2017 at 09:35 PM
p.31 #6Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Some from the market this morning. The first one with the 18-55mm and the other three with the 50-135mm f3.5 AIS.
Setting Up by T. Leighton Womack, on Flickr
Andrew by T. Leighton Womack, on Flickr
Apple Cider Doughtnuts by T. Leighton Womack, on Flickr
Old Hat by T. Leighton Womack, on Flickr
Setting Up by T. Leighton Womack, on FlickrAndrew by T. Leighton Womack, on FlickrApple Cider Doughtnuts by T. Leighton Womack, on FlickrOld Hat by T. Leighton Womack, on FlickrJun 17, 2017 at 12:40 PM
p.31 #10Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Who needs a Macro lens? That one with the 16-55 on the X-T20
Jun 17, 2017 at 03:37 PM
|
p.31 #11Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Shot from yesterday for a clothe label mini shoot.
X100F with RoboShoot and SB 910/photo box with TTL -3 EV flash, manual exposure. Alongside I was using the D810 105G with the same flash setup. For post processing portraits I am now finding the standard Fuji profiles as excellent as they are too strong for some portraits as they tend to block the shadows. The Adobe and Camera Pro Neg Hi and Pro Neg I am now finding more subtle and better suited.
X100F with RoboShoot and SB 910/photo box with TTL -3 EV flash, manual exposure. Alongside I was using the D810 105G with the same flash setup. For post processing portraits I am now finding the standard Fuji profiles as excellent as they are too strong for some portraits as they tend to block the shadows. The Adobe and Camera Pro Neg Hi and Pro Neg I am now finding more subtle and better suited.
 |
||
 |
||
|
Jun 17, 2017 at 07:22 PM
p.31 #12Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Wow - I really like this one Charles. I have been wanting to try out the X100F but have not pulled the trigger.
Jun 17, 2017 at 07:24 PM
p.31 #13Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Gary Clennan wrote:
Wow - I really like this one Charles. I have been wanting to try out the X100F but have not pulled the trigger.
Thank you very much Gary I am now only learning a lot of the subtlety in RAW files can be post processed differently with a completely different look. For most shots I just love the Fuji profiles and the Jpegs are great, but there is much more in the RAW files aside from the standard profiles. Shooting alongside the D810 105G, I was looking to get a similar feel and look and this what lead me to a different way of post processing.
Wow - I really like this one Charles. I have been wanting to try out the X100F but have not pulled the trigger.
Thank you very much Gary
I am now only learning a lot of the subtlety in RAW files can be post processed differently with a completely different look. For most shots I just love the Fuji profiles and the Jpegs are great, but there is much more in the RAW files aside from the standard profiles. Shooting alongside the D810 105G, I was looking to get a similar feel and look and this what lead me to a different way of post processing.Jun 17, 2017 at 07:34 PM
p.31 #14Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
^^^
I think about giving up the XT-2 to get the X100F the images look that good
but cost wise I might as well keep the XT-2
R
I think about giving up the XT-2 to get the X100F the images look that good
but cost wise I might as well keep the XT-2
R
Jun 17, 2017 at 07:41 PM
p.31 #16Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Reagan wrote:
^^^
I think about giving up the XT-2 to get the X100F the images look that good
but cost wise I might as well keep the XT-2
R
Personally I would not give up the XT-2 but would opt for the X100F alongside. The X100F size/weight and how it slips in your pocket means that I take the X100F everywhere with me.
^^^
I think about giving up the XT-2 to get the X100F the images look that good
but cost wise I might as well keep the XT-2
R
Personally I would not give up the XT-2 but would opt for the X100F alongside. The X100F size/weight and how it slips in your pocket means that I take the X100F everywhere with me.
Jun 17, 2017 at 07:46 PM
p.31 #17Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
There won't be a difference in IQ other than the difference in the lens.
But I agree with Charles that the RAW has way more usability especially if you're using lighting. The jpegs tend to crush shadows a bit.
Reagan wrote:
^^^
I think about giving up the XT-2 to get the X100F the images look that good
but cost wise I might as well keep the XT-2
R
But I agree with Charles that the RAW has way more usability especially if you're using lighting. The jpegs tend to crush shadows a bit.
Reagan wrote:
^^^
I think about giving up the XT-2 to get the X100F the images look that good
but cost wise I might as well keep the XT-2
R
Jun 17, 2017 at 07:49 PM
p.31 #18Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
I had an X100s once and I loved it
I gave it up to get the Xe2 which became an XT1 and now a Xt2
I just love the size of the viewfinder
GAS is never ending
R
I gave it up to get the Xe2 which became an XT1 and now a Xt2
I just love the size of the viewfinder
GAS is never ending
R
Jun 17, 2017 at 07:54 PM
p.31 #19Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Elisha82 wrote:
There won't be a difference in IQ other than the difference in the lens.
But I agree with Charles that the RAW has way more usability especially if you're using lighting. The jpegs tend to crush shadows a bit.
I think about giving up the XT-2 to get the X100F the images look that good
but cost wise I might as well keep the XT-2
R
Elisha is right, the IQ is the same except with the difference in the lens. I find the RAW profiles in Lr CC also crush the shadows and can be difficult to recover the subtle shades. Also the profile Provia Standard I find for skies can be too turquoise for my taste depending on the lighting especially late afternoon.
There won't be a difference in IQ other than the difference in the lens.
But I agree with Charles that the RAW has way more usability especially if you're using lighting. The jpegs tend to crush shadows a bit.
Reagan wrote
^^^I think about giving up the XT-2 to get the X100F the images look that good
but cost wise I might as well keep the XT-2
R
Elisha is right, the IQ is the same except with the difference in the lens. I find the RAW profiles in Lr CC also crush the shadows and can be difficult to recover the subtle shades. Also the profile Provia Standard I find for skies can be too turquoise for my taste depending on the lighting especially late afternoon.
Jun 17, 2017 at 08:50 PM
