Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
p.226 #2Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Just joining the Fuji camp having sold my Lumix S1R and some lenses, great camera, great system but in the end I noticed I brought it along less and less due to size and weight. Also, 47mp is just too much in most cases.
Having considered going back m43 and the OM-1 since I want a quick and fast camera again I instead decided on the Fujifilm X-H2S with the 23mm F2 for starters. Awesome combo, I love the small and weather sealed lens. Superb image quality except for at F2 and minimum focusing distance.
A huge benefit of the X-H2S over the OM-1 is the buffer size and speed to clear it.
So far, I've truly enjoyed the experience with the camera and lens, only downside is "lack" of long lenses as compared to m43 but we'll see how I deal with that in the future.
So three images from our Swedish "summer" as it turned out this year.
Sailing (1 of 3)
Sailing (2 of 3)
Sailing (3 of 3)
/Rasmus
Having considered going back m43 and the OM-1 since I want a quick and fast camera again I instead decided on the Fujifilm X-H2S with the 23mm F2 for starters. Awesome combo, I love the small and weather sealed lens. Superb image quality except for at F2 and minimum focusing distance.
A huge benefit of the X-H2S over the OM-1 is the buffer size and speed to clear it.
So far, I've truly enjoyed the experience with the camera and lens, only downside is "lack" of long lenses as compared to m43 but we'll see how I deal with that in the future.
So three images from our Swedish "summer" as it turned out this year.
Sailing (1 of 3)Sailing (2 of 3)Sailing (3 of 3)/Rasmus
Aug 16, 2023 at 04:03 AM
p.226 #3Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
How much reach do you need? I've been using the Tamron 150-500 lately.
Wilbus wrote:
Just joining the Fuji camp having sold my Lumix S1R and some lenses, great camera, great system but in the end I noticed I brought it along less and less due to size and weight. Also, 47mp is just too much in most cases.
Having considered going back m43 and the OM-1 since I want a quick and fast camera again I instead decided on the Fujifilm X-H2S with the 23mm F2 for starters. Awesome combo, I love the small and weather sealed lens. Superb image quality except for at F2 and minimum focusing distance.
A huge benefit of the X-H2S over...Show more →
Wilbus wrote:
Just joining the Fuji camp having sold my Lumix S1R and some lenses, great camera, great system but in the end I noticed I brought it along less and less due to size and weight. Also, 47mp is just too much in most cases.
Having considered going back m43 and the OM-1 since I want a quick and fast camera again I instead decided on the Fujifilm X-H2S with the 23mm F2 for starters. Awesome combo, I love the small and weather sealed lens. Superb image quality except for at F2 and minimum focusing distance.
A huge benefit of the X-H2S over...Show more →
Aug 16, 2023 at 08:08 AM
p.226 #4Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
JadedWriter wrote:
How much reach do you need? I've been using the Tamron 150-500 lately.
I used the 300mm F4 on m43 which is 600mm in FF terms, I also used it with the 1.4 TC which is 840mm but that's more than I need generally.
But around 600 or thereabouts would be nice for wild life and water sports shot from the shoreline (sailing, wind surfing etc).
Interesting you mention the Tamron 150-500, I was looking at it yesterday and it seems very interesting! Close enough in performance to the 150-600 Fuji according to some tests and about half the price.
How do you find it performs?
How much reach do you need? I've been using the Tamron 150-500 lately.
I used the 300mm F4 on m43 which is 600mm in FF terms, I also used it with the 1.4 TC which is 840mm but that's more than I need generally.
But around 600 or thereabouts would be nice for wild life and water sports shot from the shoreline (sailing, wind surfing etc).
Interesting you mention the Tamron 150-500, I was looking at it yesterday and it seems very interesting! Close enough in performance to the 150-600 Fuji according to some tests and about half the price.
How do you find it performs?
Aug 16, 2023 at 09:46 AM
p.226 #5Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
It's actually not too bad.
XH2S0204 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH2S0071 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH2S4715 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH2S8687 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
I absolutely suck at BIF though.
Wilbus wrote:
I used the 300mm F4 on m43 which is 600mm in FF terms, I also used it with the 1.4 TC which is 840mm but that's more than I need generally.
But around 600 or thereabouts would be nice for wild life and water sports shot from the shoreline (sailing, wind surfing etc).
Interesting you mention the Tamron 150-500, I was looking at it yesterday and it seems very interesting! Close enough in performance to the 150-600 Fuji according to some tests and about half the price.
How do you find it performs?
XH2S0204 by Marcus Beasley, on FlickrXH2S0071 by Marcus Beasley, on FlickrXH2S4715 by Marcus Beasley, on FlickrXH2S8687 by Marcus Beasley, on FlickrI absolutely suck at BIF though.
Wilbus wrote:
JadedWriter wrote
How much reach do you need? I've been using the Tamron 150-500 lately.But around 600 or thereabouts would be nice for wild life and water sports shot from the shoreline (sailing, wind surfing etc).
Interesting you mention the Tamron 150-500, I was looking at it yesterday and it seems very interesting! Close enough in performance to the 150-600 Fuji according to some tests and about half the price.
How do you find it performs?
Aug 16, 2023 at 09:53 AM
p.226 #6Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
JadedWriter wrote:
It's actually not too bad.
Indeed not bad at all!
BIF is a whole other thing I know but it's the general quality of the lens that is interesting and, to be honest, most of what I aim to do is probably not birds but more water sports and I might manage that with the 50-150 F2.8 with some luck.
It's actually not too bad.
Indeed not bad at all!
BIF is a whole other thing I know but it's the general quality of the lens that is interesting and, to be honest, most of what I aim to do is probably not birds but more water sports and I might manage that with the 50-150 F2.8 with some luck.
Aug 17, 2023 at 02:57 AM
p.226 #7Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Cats of Istanbul by Rishat Murtazin, on Flickr
Fujifilm X-Pro2 + XF23mmF2 R WR
Aug 17, 2023 at 05:38 AM
p.226 #8Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Just a quick few from last weeks session, at the new local ER facility.
Rockin' the XT5/16-55 combo.
Little flash pop as needed.
Cheers.
Rockin' the XT5/16-55 combo.
Little flash pop as needed.
Cheers.
Aug 17, 2023 at 02:25 PM
|
p.226 #11Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
On the way home by Rishat Murtazin, on Flickr
Fujifilm X-Pro2 + XF23mmF1.4 R
Aug 18, 2023 at 08:49 AM
p.226 #12Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
X100V Test Drive
46
Sunsets 1 & 2
Up Close, a great feature of the X100V is getting in close and getting an almost macro shot.
3rd time is a charm. Bought a X100V a few years ago, sold it to a friend, ultimately bought it back from him. Then sold it back to him, again. :-) Then no X100V for ~1year. :-( Missed having it, started looking and finally a fellow FM member had a really fair offer I couldn’t pass up. Thanks Jon.
So a couple of quick shots to re-familiarize myself with the controls/setup. This will be my poor man’s Q2 M/Q2. Mostly B&W and a little color.
—
Rod
46
Sunsets 1 & 2
Up Close, a great feature of the X100V is getting in close and getting an almost macro shot.
3rd time is a charm. Bought a X100V a few years ago, sold it to a friend, ultimately bought it back from him. Then sold it back to him, again. :-) Then no X100V for ~1year. :-( Missed having it, started looking and finally a fellow FM member had a really fair offer I couldn’t pass up. Thanks Jon.
So a couple of quick shots to re-familiarize myself with the controls/setup. This will be my poor man’s Q2 M/Q2. Mostly B&W and a little color.
—
Rod
Aug 18, 2023 at 06:43 PM
p.226 #13Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
XH2S0930 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH2S0995 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH2S1101 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH2S1456 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH2S1476 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH2S1516 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH2S1539 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH2S1563 by Marcus Beasley, on FlickrEdited on Aug 21, 2023 at 08:17 AM · View previous versions
Aug 19, 2023 at 07:43 PM
p.226 #15Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
XT5/ 50-140....jpg...
Changed up my usual large umbrella set up, just for fun.....to more of a triangle lighting set.
My client and I were very happy with the proofs
Cheers
Changed up my usual large umbrella set up, just for fun.....to more of a triangle lighting set.
My client and I were very happy with the proofs
Cheers
Aug 20, 2023 at 07:35 AM
p.226 #16Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Lenin by Rishat Murtazin, on Flickr
Fujifilm X-Pro2 + XF23mmF2 R WR
Aug 20, 2023 at 07:47 AM
p.226 #18Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Just a couple from last week..
XT5/10-24wr
XT5/10-24wr
Aug 20, 2023 at 03:01 PM
p.226 #20Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Cruising through Japan:
 |
||
 |
||
|
X-Pro3 XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR lens 70mm f/4.0 1/80s 160 ISO 0.0 EV
|
||
 |
||
|
X-Pro3 XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR lens 199mm f/5.0 1/80s 640 ISO 0.0 EV
|
||
 |
||
|
X-Pro3 XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR lens 70mm f/5.0 1/80s 1600 ISO 0.0 EV
|
||
 |
||
|
X-Pro3 XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR lens 300mm f/5.6 1/80s 1250 ISO 0.0 EV
|
||
 |
||
|
X-Pro3 XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR lens 300mm f/5.6 1/80s 1000 ISO 0.0 EV
|
||
 |
||
|
X-Pro3 XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR lens 159mm f/7.1 1/105s 160 ISO 0.0 EV
|
||
 |
||
|
X-Pro3 XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR lens 300mm f/7.1 1/80s 250 ISO 0.0 EV
|
||
 |
||
|
X-Pro3 XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR lens 278mm f/7.1 1/80s 320 ISO 0.0 EV
|
||
 |
||
|
X-Pro3 XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR lens 300mm f/7.1 1/80s 200 ISO 0.0 EV
|
||
 |
||
|
X-Pro3 XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR lens 300mm f/7.1 1/250s 160 ISO 0.0 EV
Aug 21, 2023 at 07:28 PM