p.2 #1 · Nikon Released D800/D800E Technical Guide
I don't think the lens list is a complete list. If it is, then it's a minor disappointment as far as the Nikon PC-e lenses, which are supposed to be some of Nikon's "best." Not that it really matters I guess, I'm not going to change out any of mine anyway.
And, as they place a lot of emphasis on diffraction, I'd like to see a table of their recommended aperture range for various lenses.
The recommended technique, at least for the library shot, is no different than good solid landscape technique anyway.
But, as someone pointed out this may not really be the camera for everyone. And maybe there is a D700 replacement coming down the pike.
p.2 #2 · Nikon Released D800/D800E Technical Guide
I'm ready and waiting for my D800E to give me all the grief, unhappiness, OOF, morie and other issues predicted by so many,, stay tuned for my post and some photos,, will turn the upload back on then,,
p.2 #5 · Nikon Released D800/D800E Technical Guide
What Nikon is really saying is there's nothing wrong with D800/E. If your images are NOT sharp enough, you need to blame yourselves for (1) not having proper shooting technique; (2) not having more expensive pro-grade Nikkors; (3) not knowing your gear.
p.2 #6 · Nikon Released D800/D800E Technical Guide
Bruce Sawle wrote:
Nikon is making a preemptive strike as i would assume there will be many amateurs with much less experience that will purchase this camera.
+1
They also know how easy it is to view an image at 100% in something like Lightroom or Aperture and that most people don't understand how what they're seeing at 100% relates to actual output.
p.2 #7 · Nikon Released D800/D800E Technical Guide
cannot imagine many shooters spending the $3K + on the 800 and they are still beginners,, know there will be a few but would believe those buying have enough between the ears to know what they are buying and have in their hands and how they will process,, now if it was a $1K to $2K perhaps if they have the pocketbook,,
haven't seen any knuckle draggers still walking the planet with a $3K camera strapped around their neck,,
p.2 #9 · Nikon Released D800/D800E Technical Guide
mshi wrote:
What Nikon is really saying is there's nothing wrong with D800/E. If your images are NOT sharp enough, you need to blame yourselves for (1) not having proper shooting technique; (2) not having more expensive pro-grade Nikkors; (3) not knowing your gear.
Its true. There is nothing wrong the the camera. It a machine that will take some skill to get the best results.
p.2 #10 · Nikon Released D800/D800E Technical Guide
You guys realize that this camera is really designed to shoot video...right?? The majority of buyers for this camera won't be all that interested in shooting still images. Its a kickass video machine, with great low light (video) capabilities. For this price they'll sell a ton of them.
p.2 #12 · Nikon Released D800/D800E Technical Guide
rhyder wrote:
You guys realize that this camera is really designed to shoot video...right?? The majority of buyers for this camera won't be all that interested in shooting still images. Its a kickass video machine, with great low light (video) capabilities
I hope that's sarcasm.
It's so far from a 'camera really designed to shoot video' it's not even funny.
1. No over-under exposure zebras.
2. No focus peaking.
3. No programmable follow focus points.
4. No raw video.
5. No slow motion at 1080p
6. No resolution beyond 1080p, and 1080p resolution delivered has historical been subpar.
The list could be expanded upon I'm sure. DSLR video is a great tool, they're a long way from being built for video though. Red builds cameras built for video.
p.2 #13 · Nikon Released D800/D800E Technical Guide
Jammy Straub wrote:
I hope that's sarcasm.
It's so far from a 'camera really designed to shoot video' it's not even funny.
1. No over-under exposure zebras.
2. No focus peaking.
3. No programmable follow focus points.
4. No raw video.
5. No slow motion at 1080p
6. No resolution beyond 1080p, and 1080p resolution delivered has historical been subpar.
The list could be expanded upon I'm sure. DSLR video is a great tool, they're a long way from being built for video though. Red builds cameras built for video.
Yes, it is a bit tongue in cheek. But, what I'm saying that it was designed for the DSLR video market. Is it a Red? No. But it's only 3K instead of 30K. It was made to compete with the 5D anfdyou full well know it.
