Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1      
2
       3       end
  

Archive 2010 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2
  
 
jhinkey
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #1 · p.2 #1 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


Todd - what body and aperture did you capture that image with?

My current "cream machines" are:
28/2 AI
50/1.2 AIS
105/2.5 AIS
135/2 AIS
200/4 AIS

I like the bokeh from these better than any of my current AFS zooms.

- John



Aug 19, 2010 at 03:37 PM
Todd Adamson
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #2 · p.2 #2 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


Thanks, John. That's from the D3, at f/2. I have not shot a single image with the 135 at anything smaller than 2.0, except by accident. I'm thinking of super-glueing down that aperture ring.


Aug 19, 2010 at 03:42 PM
Todd Adamson
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #3 · p.2 #3 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


I guess I am becoming an evangelist for this piece of glass.








Aug 20, 2010 at 06:36 PM
CGrindahl
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #4 · p.2 #4 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


Todd Adamson wrote:
I guess I am becoming an evangelist for this piece of glass.

http://fredmiranda.adamsonstudios.com.s3.amazonaws.com/135f2/_D3A9953.jpg


With photos like this you'll be very successful as an evangelist. Gorgeous color, buttery bokeh. Who could ask for more?

I imagine that as you consider a replacement for the 85 f/1.4, especially after the experience you've been having with this fine old manual focus lens, that you'll be looking at the 105 f/2.5 AI-s being featured at the moment on another thread. That is a gorgeous piece of glass. I'm also toying with idea of picking up the 85 f/2 AI-s. I'm coming to love the 85 f/1.4 but the experience of shooting manual focus is very satisfying. Of course, this might be the focal length that has you opening your wallet for a Zeiss lens...



Aug 20, 2010 at 07:17 PM
Todd Adamson
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #5 · p.2 #5 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


CGrindahl wrote:
Of course, this might be the focal length that has you opening your wallet for a Zeiss lens...


Heh.

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/928218




Aug 20, 2010 at 07:34 PM
CGrindahl
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #6 · p.2 #6 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


Todd Adamson wrote:
Heh.

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/928218



Faith and begorrah... Business in Iowa City is better than I thought!

I'll be very curious to hear your experience with that beautiful lens. I expect you will share photos as you've done with the 135. Congratulations!



Aug 20, 2010 at 07:39 PM
Todd Adamson
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #7 · p.2 #7 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


CGrindahl wrote:
Faith and begorrah... Business in Iowa City is better than I thought!



Business isn't bad, but I certainly can't afford to just drop $$ for a lens like this.

Step #1: convince myself that 85mm is too short for me now, so I could sell my f/1.4

Step #2: dig up a few other things I don't use much, and sell those

Step #3: skip a few sushi lunches that I shouldn't be having anyway.

Problem solved.

I just have to see what all of the Zeiss fuss is about.



Aug 20, 2010 at 08:17 PM
CGrindahl
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #8 · p.2 #8 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


That you can find sushi i Iowa City is in itself a statement... of course, then I remind myself it is a university town and anything is possible... I'm delighted for you Todd.

By the way, I'm originally from Minnesota, so I have roots in the region. I visited family in Minneapolis in July, as a matter of fact. But California has been home for more years than I can count, something for which I'm most grateful. That said, I appreciate values of the midwest. It is a wonderful place to raise a family. That sushi can be found makes it even better...



Aug 20, 2010 at 11:52 PM
spentomuch
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #9 · p.2 #9 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


Congratulations on the Zeiss Todd, I'm sure you can give it a good ride.
If the Zeiss turns out to be the cats meow, and I hope it is, then maybe that old ais will be needing a new home, and just so happens I have a spot on my shelf.



Aug 21, 2010 at 12:33 AM
Todd Adamson
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #10 · p.2 #10 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


spentomuch wrote:
Congratulations on the Zeiss Todd, I'm sure you can give it a good ride.
If the Zeiss turns out to be the cats meow, and I hope it is, then maybe that old ais will be needing a new home, and just so happens I have a spot on my shelf.


Ha! I honestly feel glad That my 70-200 was on my D3 when I dropped it today. Had it been the 135, I'd really be crying.



Aug 21, 2010 at 05:29 AM
 

Search in Used Dept. 



jhinkey
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #11 · p.2 #11 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


In an effort to further understand this lens (135/2 AIS) I took a few moments out of my crazy day and shot a series of test images from my 135/2 AIS, 80-200AFS, and 70-300AFS VR (all at 135mm of course).

Later on some time I'll compare these guys at f/2.8 and f/5.6, but for now I wanted to see how good the f/2 image could be from the 135/2 AIS.

My favorite (i.e., most convenient) test target is the view from my front steps of the utility pole in the alley way of the next block over (those who know me form dpreview or photo.net already know this subject well). It was a bright and contrasty sunny late afternoon which provided for some harsh lighting.

Here's the scene:





For some reason my D300 over-exposes this lens when wide open by about 1/3 of a stop.

Here's a 100% crop from RAW in NX2 with no corrections at all:





The contrast is a bit low due to the flare and oh that purple fringing!

Doing some work in NX2 via Axial CA Control, -0.3EV exp. comp., some curves adjustment, and 40,4,4, USM (normally I use 20,4,4 for a "sharp" image from RAW) gives me this:






I think it cleans up pretty well - especially when you get rid of the PF.

So, as some of you may already know, this lens wide open has some issues with high contrast scenes, but the detail is still there if you clean up the Axial CA and perhaps adjust the contrast and/or curves a bit. Really, f/2 is for low contrast people shots, which is what I bought it for, but it can clean up really well for high contrast stuff.

Now if I could just focus this lens more accurately on my D300 I'd be all set!

John





Aug 21, 2010 at 06:24 AM
jhinkey
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #12 · p.2 #12 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


Oh yes, here's the same scene at f/2.8, with only some light Axial CA control and 20,4,4 USM in NX2.






The very fixed up f/2 image is not that far off from the lightly tweaked f/2.8!

- John



Aug 21, 2010 at 06:32 AM
Todd Adamson
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #13 · p.2 #13 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


Thanks for posting those, John. It's always good to know what a lens is capable of at a more technical level. But you're right, this lens shines for portraits, where we usually try hard to control the contrast in the scene, so get out and shoot some people!!

I think if I blew my headshots up to 100% and found some CA, etc., it wouldn't bother me one bit at this point.



Aug 23, 2010 at 02:46 AM
dj dunzie
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #14 · p.2 #14 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


Wow congrats on the Zeiss 100 Todd... had the pleasure of test driving it yesterday for about an hour. Really nice color rendition and seemingly smooth operation that made AF very manageable. Built well, all metal. I don't know that for undisputed fact the IQ is necessarily better than the 105/f2.5 AI-s, but it is a real pleasure to use so that might be the biggest thing. I'd be lying if I told you I hadn't been scouring the buy and sell forums looking at prices for the very same lens. Enjoy!!

Post up some pics once you get some seat time with it.

I mainly took candid portraits while I had it, and unfortunately I don't want to post shots of the subjects without their expressed ok, so all I really got to show here is a few buildings and signs, but you get a feel for the color rendition anyway...












... I'm sure you'll love it.



Aug 23, 2010 at 03:09 AM
Todd Adamson
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #15 · p.2 #15 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


I'm drooling already. Waiting to hear from my insurance company tomorrow, but I am expecting they will want me to ship the D3 to Nikon for evaluation, so I may be doing the first shots with the Zeiss on a cropper.


Aug 23, 2010 at 03:28 AM
jhinkey
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #16 · p.2 #16 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


Todd Adamson wrote:
Thanks for posting those, John. It's always good to know what a lens is capable of at a more technical level. But you're right, this lens shines for portraits, where we usually try hard to control the contrast in the scene, so get out and shoot some people!!

I think if I blew my headshots up to 100% and found some CA, etc., it wouldn't bother me one bit at this point.

Todd -

I have very limited time for photography, but my favorite people to shoot are my twin girls (now 7), but I need practice shooting them since they are rarely still for any appreciable time.
I'm getting better at MF'ing MF lenses, but my D300 is really tough to use with really fast lenses.

Thanks -

John



Aug 23, 2010 at 06:12 AM
JR Magat
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #17 · p.2 #17 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


Todd Adamson wrote:
I'm drooling already. Waiting to hear from my insurance company tomorrow, but I am expecting they will want me to ship the D3 to Nikon for evaluation, so I may be doing the first shots with the Zeiss on a cropper.


i'm curious how you'd compare the Zeiss to your 135 f/2... if you get even better results with the Zeiss, then that'd be very impressive!

i'm also curious what you think of MF on the crop body versus your D3



Aug 23, 2010 at 02:06 PM
Todd Adamson
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #18 · p.2 #18 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


JR Magat wrote:
i'm curious how you'd compare the Zeiss to your 135 f/2... if you get even better results with the Zeiss, then that'd be very impressive!

i'm also curious what you think of MF on the crop body versus your D3


I'm sure I will have some experience soon. I'm not really expecting the Zeiss to have the same neutral creaminess to the bokeh, and I won't be at all surprised if I still use the 135 more for portraits. But I am expecting razor sharpness, great pop, beautiful colors and better microcontrast. I plan on using it for the occasional street photography, fine art and macro stuff. But keep quiet about that: I told my wife I HAD to have it for portraiture.



Aug 23, 2010 at 03:31 PM
Todd Adamson
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #19 · p.2 #19 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


CGrindahl wrote:
That you can find sushi i Iowa City is in itself a statement... of course, then I remind myself it is a university town and anything is possible... I'm delighted for you Todd.

By the way, I'm originally from Minnesota, so I have roots in the region. I visited family in Minneapolis in July, as a matter of fact. But California has been home for more years than I can count, something for which I'm most grateful. That said, I appreciate values of the midwest. It is a wonderful place to raise a family. That sushi can be found makes it
...Show more

I missed this post before somehow. I've definitely had better sushi in Beverly Hills. And Alaska, and Florida. But there are definitely some worthwhile places in the Iowa City area.



Aug 23, 2010 at 03:33 PM
jhinkey
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #20 · p.2 #20 · Another classic: pre-AI 135 f/2


I gave the 135/2 AIS another go this evening with my D300 shooting my girls at the playground in the late evening. F/2 or f/2.8 sure comes in handy and the weight of the 135/2 surely helps to keep things steady for lower shutter speeds.

Anyway, my manual focus hit rate:
@f/4.0: 80%-100%
@f/2.8 50%-75%
@f/2.0 <25% (or even 10%).

Like with my other MF Nikkors I've been experimenting with the KatzEye and the focus indicator - my fast shorter focal length lenses I've gotten pretty good at, but I'm having troubles with the 135/2 trying to get decent focus using the split screen, microprisms, and/or the AF indicator dot.
Anyone have any suggestions on how to get a better chance at using f/2 or f/2.8 with this lens and a D300+Katzeye screen? Has anyone had to get their AF system and/or focus screen calibrated to be able to reliably focus this lens at f/2?

Thanks -

John

BTW when I do nail the focus at f/2.8 or f/2 the results can be quite impressive!



Aug 26, 2010 at 06:22 AM
1      
2
       3       end




FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1      
2
       3       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Reset password