I guess I should have been a little more specific as I was thinking about lenses in the wide~ish to normal range. Long tele\'s are not really my thing.
I\'m not familiar with the 60/2.8 macro although I did see the flower shots posted and the color rendering is impressive to say the least. I didn\'t realize it\'s only an R mount (or is it?).
When there\'s a choice, such as the 50 lux, or cron, is there any reason to spend the $$$$ for M mount when there are quite a few R mount to be had for much less? I know they are a little larger, but the size difference is not substantial, is it?
Oct 14, 2011 at 07:41 PM
Previous versions of Jacob D's message #9998604 « Sony (APS-C) Images Thread »
