Here\'s some test shots I took about an hour after I posted this sale - all hand-held.
All that follow below were not processed heavily even though a few appear as if they were. Several appear to have had the saturation boosted but that\'s just how it came out after white balancing. All received very slight sharpening prior to scaling 0.3 pixels, 30%. Basically these are how the raws looked when displayed in ACR with default settings.
First up the Sigma DL 70-300mm f/4 (Macro) at 70mm, 200mm, and 300mm all wide open from about 4m away from the focus point:
Here\'s some test shots I took about an hour after I posted this sale - all hand-held.
All that follow below were not processed heavily even though a few appear as if they were. Several appear to have had the saturation boosted but that\'s just how it came out after white balancing. All received very slight sharpening prior to scaling 0.3 pixels, 30%. Basically these are how the raws looked when displayed in ACR with default settings.
First up the Sigma DL 70-300mm f/4 (Macro) at 70mm, 200mm, and 300mm all wide open from about 4m away from the focus point:
Here\'s some test shots I took about an hour after I posted this sale - all hand-held.
All that follow below were not processed heavily even though a few appear as if they were. Several appear to have had the saturation boosted but that\'s just how it came out after white balancing. All received very slight sharpening prior to scaling 0.3 pixels, 30%. Basically these are how the raws looked when displayed in ACR with default settings.
First up the Sigma DL 70-300mm f/4 (Macro) at 70mm, 200mm, and 300mm all wide open from about 4m away from the focus point:
Here\'s some test shots I took about an hour after I posted this sale - all hand-held.
All that follow below were not processed heavily even though a few appear as if they were. Several appear to have had the saturation boosted but that\'s just how it came out after white balancing. All received very slight sharpening prior to scaling 0.3 pixels, 30%. Basically these are how the raws looked when displayed in ACR with default settings.
First up the Sigma DL 70-300mm f/4 (Macro) at 70mm, 200mm, and 300mm all wide open from about 4m away from the focus point:
Here\'s some test shots I took about an hour after I posted this sale - all hand-held but the long exposure one near the bottom - which I used my bicycle seat for.
All that follow below were not processed heavily even though a few appear as if they were. Several appear to have had the saturation boosted but that\'s just how it came out after white balancing. All received very slight sharpening prior to scaling 0.3 pixels, 30%. Basically these are how the raws looked when displayed in ACR with default settings.
First up the Sigma DL 70-300mm f/4 (Macro) at 70mm, 200mm, and 300mm all wide open from about 4m away from the focus point:
Here\'s some test shots I took about an hour after I posted this:
All the follow below were not processed heavily even though a few appear as if they were. Several appear to have had the saturation boosted but that\'s just how it came out after white balancing. All received very slight sharpening prior to scaling 0.3 pixels, 30%. Basically these are how the raws looked when displayed in ACR with default settings.
First up the Sigma DL 70-300mm f/4 (Macro) at 70mm, 200mm, and 300mm all wide open from about 4m away from the focus point:
Sep 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM
Previous versions of Bifurcator's message #9948099 « FS: PriceDrop 3X: Boxed Sigma 24-70 for Sony Alpha »
