fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of RustyBug's message #9875011 « Zeiss 35mm F2 vs Samyang 35mm F1.4 »

  

RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: Zeiss 35mm F2 vs Samyang 35mm F1.4


denoir wrote:
RustyBug wrote:
denoir wrote:
have you ever used the 35-70? It\'s my favorite landscape 35, plus it does decent macro and 36-70.

No, not really. But from what I can see in the MTF charts, I\'m pretty sure I wouldn\'t like it for landscapes. (\"like\" in this case is a relative term)


What makes you say that ??








There are a couple of things that I want from a landscape lens:

1) Limited field curvature
2) Parallel sagittal and tangential lines (i.e. consistent blur & micro contrast regardless of direction)
3) High micro contrast in the fine detail (i.e 40 lp/mm).

The 35-70 @ 35mm doesn\'t qualify because of 2 & 3. The 35 Lux because of 1) and the 35/2 Distagon ZE because of 1, 2 & 3.


Luka ... I\'m with you on #2 very much, especially at 10 & 20 ... maybe a bit more lenient @ 40. Could you expand on #1 a bit re: mtf.

So what would be your top 3 choices for a FF EF mount (adaptable/convertible okay) for a 35mm landscape lens that meet your criteria ... i.e. no rangefinder glass.



Aug 28, 2011 at 08:46 AM
RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: Zeiss 35mm F2 vs Samyang 35mm F1.4


denoir wrote:
RustyBug wrote:
denoir wrote:
have you ever used the 35-70? It\'s my favorite landscape 35, plus it does decent macro and 36-70.

No, not really. But from what I can see in the MTF charts, I\'m pretty sure I wouldn\'t like it for landscapes. (\"like\" in this case is a relative term)


What makes you say that ??








There are a couple of things that I want from a landscape lens:

1) Limited field curvature
2) Parallel sagittal and tangential lines (i.e. consistent blur & micro contrast regardless of direction)
3) High micro contrast in the fine detail (i.e 40 lp/mm).

The 35-70 @ 35mm doesn\'t qualify because of 2 & 3. The 35 Lux because of 1) and the 35/2 Distagon ZE because of 1, 2 & 3.


Luka ... I\'m with you on #2 very much, especially at 10 & 20 ... maybe a bit more lenient @ 40. Could you expand on #1 a bit re: mtf.

So what would be your top 3 choices for a FF EF mount (adaptable/convertible okay) for a 35mm landscape lens that meet your criteria ... i.e. no rangefinder glass.



Aug 28, 2011 at 08:44 AM





  Previous versions of RustyBug's message #9875011 « Zeiss 35mm F2 vs Samyang 35mm F1.4 »