Jerry_R wrote: sebboh wrote:
second: if you want to do this test well, you should have both lenses stopped down at least a bit
That would make no sense to me... When I also wanted to answer myself question, to what extent NEX can be a backup for M9, I was MOTSLY interested in wide open image quality.
If I would need sharp pictures with large DOF - then u43 acts much better than NEX - taking into account its existing lenses.
i mean to test what the dof conversion factor is. if you just want to test whether the NEX will serve your purpose there is no reason to compare at all – just take the NEX and see if it can do what you want it to.
denoir wrote: sebboh wrote:
first: i\'m not seeing much difference between how much is in focus. i am seeing quite a difference in how blurred and what type of blur the oof regions are.
You\'re not seeing that you can\'t read half the text in one shot and not in the other?
i certainly see that, when i count the number of readable lines there is a big difference, but when i count the number of lines that actually look to be in focus rather than the number that are readable i get the same number
Jerry_R wrote: sebboh wrote:
second: if you want to do this test well, you should have both lenses stopped down at least a bit
That would make no sense to me... When I also wanted to answer myself question, to what extent NEX can be a backup for M9, I was MOTSLY interested in wide open image quality.
If I would need sharp pictures with large DOF - then u43 acts much better than NEX - taking into account its existing lenses.
i mean to test what the dof conversion factor. if you just want to test whether the NEX will serve your purpose there is no reason to compare at all – just take the NEX and see if it can do what you want it to.
denoir wrote: sebboh wrote:
first: i\'m not seeing much difference between how much is in focus. i am seeing quite a difference in how blurred and what type of blur the oof regions are.
You\'re not seeing that you can\'t read half the text in one shot and not in the other?
i certainly see that, when i count the number of readable lines there is a big difference, but when i count the number of lines that actually look to be in focus rather than the number that are readable i get the same number
Aug 05, 2011 at 06:05 PM
Previous versions of sebboh's message #9816814 « Sony NEX-C3 first impressions »
