SKumar25 wrote: charlesk wrote: SKumar25 wrote:
You may not see it but many do.
Which doesn\'t mean it is actually there.
Denoirs tests showed that this is not imagined.
And Aravind\'s various comparisons showed they are...what of it? I think, after twenty some-odd pages of the same back and forth, we should just agree to disagree.
The only way of truly knowing is to view a series of actual prints in person and for someone to go through and pick out which lenses were used to make which prints and I can absolutely guarantee not one person will guess correctly for every single print.
SKumar25 wrote: charlesk wrote: SKumar25 wrote:
You may not see it but many do.
Which doesn\'t mean it is actually there.
Denoirs tests showed that this is not imagined.
And Aravind\'s various comparisons showed they are...what of it? I think, after twenty some-odd pages of the same back and forth, we should just agree to disagree.
Jun 03, 2011 at 09:22 AM
Previous versions of M Vers's message #9643563 « Digital-Picture review ZE 100 MP lens »
