alundeb wrote: M Vers wrote:
I don\'t know who Ernie is or which thread you\'re referring to, however my point remains. If Aravind were to take a series of ten images, five images each comparing five different scenes with identical settings, lighting, framing and subject matter, and either print them for comparison or post them here with stripped exif I highly doubt anyone will be able to differentiate them, especially not after post processing.
I am a bit surprised that you have reached your conclusions without even seeing this:
I could easily do the same with Aravind\'s images if he made them the same way. You will be shocked to hear how I did it:
The focal length is 3% shorter.
I am embarrassed to admit that \"cheating\" is how I was able to tell which was which (i.e. the Zeiss images are the ones that are \"shorter\"). I could tell them apart in any other way, even though others were claiming the Zeiss had nicer contrast, etc...
May 30, 2011 at 11:24 AM
Previous versions of thedigitalbean's message #9631511 « Digital-Picture review ZE 100 MP lens »
