Philber - Really lovely flower shots. Bitingly sharp they are. Amazing color and strong rendition of volume. I also appreciate that in the first shot, foreground is in bokeh, then the second shot it is the opposite. Oh I forgot. I\'d love to see you do Versaille Pano. That would be a treat
Fracas - I agree with Philber. There is nothing wrong with the BW version, but that color shot is much more fun. It has the look of contemporary film, like Tom Tykwer ( The International, to be more specific ) I just love that look.
Carsten - Is it possible, that it is not the sharpness that you are missing, but something else ?? Here is the resaon why I ask. That shot of tree is quite sharp to my eyes. Love the reflection and growth at water level. Very lovely color, and it still have quite nice bokeh in the background. What not to like eh?? Anyhow, looking at your tree photo, reminded me of Samli\'s series of 50mm comparison shots ( probably 150 pages ago. I was not participating this thread yet, just reading. ) What struck me in that comparison was, how different the rendition of lenses were. ( My preference was actually 50 planar, surprise, suprise , but that is irrelevant ) I am not saying you should get 50 planar though
Bob - Great shots. Beautiful flowers. Tree shot (#3) is very pretty.
Wayne - Great shots of snow with 21. Juxtaposition of skull against beautiful snow mountain is unique and very strong.
Hugo - Wow, beautiful shots. Love the first one the most, but they are all beautiful.
Philber - Really lovely flower shots. Bitingly sharp they are. I also appreciate that in the first shot, foreground is in bokeh, then the second shot it is the opposite. Oh I forgot. I\'d love to see you do Versaille Pano. That would be a treat
Fracas - I agree with Philber. There is nothing wrong with the BW version, but that color shot is much more fun. It has the look of contemporary film, like Tom Tykwer ( The International, to be more specific ) I just love that look.
Carsten - Is it possible, that it is not the sharpness that you are missing, but something else ?? Here is the resaon why I ask. That shot of tree is quite sharp to my eyes. Love the reflection and growth at water level. Very lovely color, and it still have quite nice bokeh in the background. What not to like eh?? Anyhow, looking at your tree photo, reminded me of Samli\'s series of 50mm comparison shots ( probably 150 pages ago. I was not participating this thread yet, just reading. ) What struck me in that comparison was, how different the rendition of lenses were. ( My preference was actually 50 planar, surprise, suprise , but that is irrelevant ) I am not saying you should get 50 planar though
Bob - Great shots. Beautiful flowers. Tree shot (#3) is very pretty.
Wayne - Great shots of snow with 21. Juxtaposition of skull against beautiful snow mountain is unique and very strong.
Hugo - Wow, beautiful shots. Love the first one the most, but they are all beautiful.
Philber - Really lovely flower shots. Bitingly sharp they are. I also appreciate that firs shot, foreground is in bokeh, and second shot it is the opposite. Oh I forgot. I\'d love to see you do Versaille Pano. That would be a treat
Fracas - I agree with Philber. There is nothing wrong with the BW version, but that color shot is much more fun. It has the look of contemporary film, like Tom Tykwer ( The International, to be more specific ) I just love that look.
Carsten - Is it possible, that it is not the sharpness that you are missing, but something else ?? Here is the resaon why I ask. That shot of tree is quite sharp to my eyes. Love the reflection and growth at water level. Very lovely color, and it still have quite nice bokeh in the background. What not to like eh?? Anyhow, looking at your tree photo, reminded me of Samli\'s series of 50mm comparison shots ( probably 150 pages ago. I was not participating this thread yet, just reading. ) What struck me in that comparison was, how different the rendition of lenses were. ( My preference was actually 50 planar, surprise, suprise , but that is irrelevant ) I am not saying you should get 50 planar though
Bob - Great shots. Beautiful flowers. Tree shot (#3) is very pretty.
Wayne - Great shots of snow with 21. Juxtaposition of skull against beautiful snow mountain is unique and very strong.
Hugo - Wow, beautiful shots. Love the first one the most, but they are all beautiful.
Philber - Really lovely flower shots. Bitingly sharp they are. I also appreciate that firs shot, foreground is in bokeh, and second shot it is the opposite. Oh I forgot. I\'d love to see you do Versaille Pano. That would be a treat
Fracas - I agree with Philber. There is nothing wrong with the BW version, but that color shot is much more fun. It has the look of contemporary film, like Tom Tykwer ( The International, to be more specific ) I just love that look.
Carsten - Is it possible, that it is not the sharpness that you are missing, but something else ?? Here is a resaon why I ask. That shot of tree is quite sharp to my eyes. Love the reflection and growth at water level. Very lovely color, and it still have quite nice bokeh in the background. What not to like eh?? Anyhow, looking at your tree photo, reminded me of Samli\'s series of 50mm comparison shots ( probably 150 pages ago. I was not participating this thread yet, just reading. ) What struck me in that comparison was, how different the rendition of lenses were. ( My preference was actually 50 planar, surprise, suprise , but that is irrelevant ) I am not saying you should get 50 planar though
Bob - Great shots. Beautiful flowers. Tree shot (#3) is very pretty.
Wayne - Great shots of snow with 21. Juxtaposition of skull against beautiful snow mountain is unique and very strong.
Hugo - Wow, beautiful shots. Love the first one the most, but they are all beautiful.
