fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of Paul Buff's message #9476160 « Paul C. Buff Einstein 640 in-depth flash duration test: action v.s constant color mode »

  

Paul Buff
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Paul C. Buff Einstein 640 in-depth flash duration test: a...


I mentioned the power output earlier in this thread . . . the Grafit at 1/4 power is roughly equal to Einstein in WS and t.1 times according to one independent link test posted earlier in this thread. Einstein reaches 1/10,000 t.1 at about 50WS, I have no chart of Grafit duration VS power, but it never gets faster than 1/8000. There may be power levels between 40 and 160WS where Grafit is faster . . . you\'re asking for info that I don\'t have and implying I am not telling the whole story. I am telling what I know . . . if others know more, they should speak up here.

I have never stated one system is faster or better than the other, or that there is anything wrong with Grafit . . . just stated the comparisons other have made. Instead of accusations against my posts and equipment, how about some supported opposing viewpoints and specs? We\'re not comparing apples to apples here . . . prospective customers should really gather a better understanding of their wants and needs and budgets and intended uses before buying anything.

Here is chart of Einstein t.1 VS power:

http://www.paulcbuff.com/pcb2009/e640detail.html



Apr 07, 2011 at 01:22 PM





  Previous versions of Paul Buff's message #9476160 « Paul C. Buff Einstein 640 in-depth flash duration test: action v.s constant color mode »