thats from back to front. If you acount for the focus at 5,6 being slightly more to the front, you can see, that using 5,6 for an image that should be sharp from frame to frame might not be such a good idea with the 25. It would be much worse still at close range with different fosusing.
I can also conclude that 2,8 and 4 are really bad at the front corners. 5,6 I need to test again. 8 and 11 are both fine. All apertures are fine at infinity in the far corners. If DOF is enough
will depend on the framing, that is how much to the front do I want things sharp.
This is 100 %. I am not sure it shows at full size. Should be 1078 pixels wide. Its a screencapture out of Capture one. Not the best method, but you can at least see some things. Sorry for the red indicating blown highlights, couldn\'t switch that off.
sorry, I kept adding stuff in the editing... now the files are also showing up full size.
thats from back to front. If you acount for the focus at 5,6 being slightly more to the front, you can see, that using 5,6 for an image that should be sharp from frame to frame might not be such a good idea with the 25. It would be much worse still at close range with different fosusing.
I can also conclude that 2,8 and 4 are really bad at the front corners. 5,6 I need to test again. 8 and 11 are both fine. All apertures are fine at infinity in the far corners. If DOF is enough
will depend on the framing, that is how much to the front do I want things sharp.
This is 100 %. I am not sure it shows at full size. Should be 1078 pixels wide. Its a screencapture out of Capture one. Not the best method, but you can at least see some things. Sorry for the red indicating blown highlights, couldn\'t switch that off.
sorry, I kept adding stuff in the editing... now the files are also showing up full size.
thats from back to front. If you acount for the focus at 5,6 being slightly more to the front, you can see, that using 5,6 for an image that should be sharp from frame to frame might not be such a good idea with the 25. It would be much worse still at close range with different fosusing.
I can also conclude that 2,8 and 4 are really bad at the front corners. 5,6 I need to test again. 8 and 11 are both fine. All apertures are fine at infinity in the far corners. If DOF is enough
will depend on the framing, that is how much to the front do I want things sharp.
This is 100 %. I am not sure it shows at full size. Should be 1078 pixels wide. Its a screencapture out of Capture one. Not the best method, but you can at least see some things. Sorry for the red indicating blown highlights, couldn\'t switch that off.
sorry, I kept adding stuff in the editing... now the files are also showing up full size.
thats from back to front. If you acount for the focus at 5,6 being slightly more to the front, you can see, that using 5,6 for an image that should be sharp from frame to frame might not be such a good idea with the 25. It would be much worse still at close range with different fosusing.
I can also conclude that 2,8 and 4 are really bad at the front corners. 5,6 I need to test again. 8 and 11 are both fine. All apertures are fine at infinity in the far corners. If DOF is enough
will depend on the framing, that is how much to the front do I want things sharp.
This is 100 %. I am not sure it shows at full size. Should be 1078 pixels wide. Its a screencapture out of Capture one. Not the best method, but you can at least see some things. Sorry for the red indicating blown highlights, couldn\'t switch that off.
sorry, I kept adding stuff in the editing... now the files are also showing up full size.
thats from back to front. If you acount for the focus at 5,6 being slightly more to the front, you can see, that using 5,6 for an image that should be sharp from frame to frame might not be such a good idea with the 25. It would be much worse still at close range with different fosusing.
I can also conclude that 2,8 and 4 are really bad at the front corners. 5,6 I need to test again. 8 and 11 are both fine. All apertures are fine at infinity in the far corners. If DOF is enough
will depend on the framing, that is how much to the front do I want things sharp.
This is 100 %. I am not sure it shows at full size. Should be 1078 pixels wide. Its a screencapture out of Capture one. Not the best method, but you can at least see some things. Sorry for the red indicating blown highlights, couldn\'t switch that off.
sorry, I kept adding stuff in the editing... now the files are also showing up full size.
I misfocused for infinity at f5,6 unfortunately (two attempts, this was the better one)
thats from back to front. If you acount for the focus at 5,6 being slightly more to the front, you can see, that using 5,6 for an image that should be sharp from frame to frame might not be such a good idea with the 25. It would be much worse still at close range with different fosusing.
I can also conclude that 2,8 and 4 are really bad at the front corners. 5,6 I need to test again. 8 and 11 are both fine. All apertures are fine at infinity in the far corners. If DOF is enough
will depend on the framing, that is how much to the front do I want things sharp.
This is 100 %. I am not sure it shows at full size. Should be 1078 pixels wide. Its a screencapture out of Capture one. Not the best method, but you can at least see some things. Sorry for the red indicating blown highlights, couldn\'t switch that off.
