thank you Ulf. The first two are really working well, but the setup is much easier due to large object-background distance.
the last one is better comparable to my marguerittes, which are admittedly a bad setup for any lens, because there is no single focus plane.
I agree on the nice blur! Especially in the last one the transition from sharp to blurred areas is really good!
I need to do some more experimenting with the 25 though. From what I found out so far, it is better not to go right up to MFD (which is about 6 cm from the front lens!), since the DOF there is just to thin and overall sharpness very bad. I need to do another test run with a bit further away and maybe using f 3,2 or 4 and keeping the background forther away or keep it a smooth smooth like wood. A rose would be a better test object than those marguerittes for a lens with field curvature.
I\'d love it if anyone could show some images shot with the 28. Apparently this is even sharper than either 25 or 21 across the frame. It also focusses rather close. Does anyone have a sample up real close? Is it any good for landscape and nature, or is it rather confined to it\'s primary use reportage and street?
