gt3rs wrote:
An unscientific size comparison between the 500 and the 200-400.
Looking at Nikon 200-400 spec and assuming that the switches size and canon badge have the same size across the two lenses I should not be too far off.
Is that the old 500, or the Mk II? This does give some insight as to the size/weight of the new lens. I tried, without success, to compare the picture of the 2-4/1.4 to my 300/2.8 but I couldn\'t really match them up. The best I could guess was that the 200-400 was around 2 inches longer.
Feb 08, 2011 at 09:23 AM
Previous versions of Tom_W's message #9296599 « Canon 200-400mm f/4L IS announced »
