Home · Register · Join Upload & Sell

  

  Previous versions of j.liam's message #9068344 « Zeiss 28/2 and 35/2 comparison »

  

j.liam
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Zeiss 28/2 and 35/2 comparison


Keith B. wrote:

True all, but remember that the ZF 35 is a floating element(CRC) lens after all. Zeiss failed to include mention of it in their literature for the first year or so, but now it\'s there...and, I checked mine when the subject came up recently elsewhere, and as you turn the focusing ring, you can see some of the internal elements move relative to each other. I then carried the ZF 35 on a few hikes in the desert southwest, and used it for very close shots of lichen on rocks, etc, and it\'s pretty good close up(say 1:10 down to 1:5 or so.). As good as the ZF50MP or ZF100MP? No, not that good...but...useable nonetheless.


Well, if it does have the correction and they haven\'t mentioned it, perhaps they feel that at that range, the correction isn\'t worthy of the \'Zeiss\' label and simply gloss over it.

The photos with the 28 are strikingly evocative! I can\'t say my sample behaved in such an exemplary fashion but it may have been my single sample.



Nov 24, 2010 at 10:31 AM





  Previous versions of j.liam's message #9068344 « Zeiss 28/2 and 35/2 comparison »

 




This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.