mawz wrote: schristie11 wrote: mawz wrote:Prices vary. Sony\'s expensive in some places (the 70-200G and 300G are both distinctly more costly than they should be) and cheaper in others.
Right!
That\'s my point exactly.
No your point was
Sony charges more for their name brand products than other MFG\'s in EVERY case, except the end of year close out sale.
I just disproved that it\'s in every case.
How you disprove? wiht your sily 50 1.8 argument? lol
The canon 50 1.8 is $99. and so it is cheaper too.
Nov 24, 2010 at 12:39 AM
Previous versions of schristie11's message #9067455 « Canon to Sony?... »
