schristie11 wrote:
Even if there was some advantage to the latest Sony product,
if your can’t have the product in your hands for a few years or decades,
then what good is it?
and why pay more for it? - rewarding mediocrity
Nikon has the same problems to a somewhat lesser extent. They have far less production capacity than Canon and new lenses/bodies are often scarcely available. Being a smaller company with less production volume, you\'ll logically pay more for a product equal in quality to Canon, let alone a higher quality ones.
Nov 24, 2010 at 12:29 AM
Previous versions of AhamB's message #9067431 « Canon to Sony?... »
