Home · Register · Join Upload & Sell

  

  Previous versions of j.liam's message #9065233 « Zeiss 28/2 and 35/2 comparison »

  

j.liam
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Zeiss 28/2 and 35/2 comparison


Who tests a lens without CRC and expects it to function in that fashion and then serves this up as the major caviat on the optic?
I can observe that my Nikkor 14-24 is a poor macro lens but the comment would be asinine and immaterial. Or to quote an old Yiddish adage, \"If my grandmother had wheels, she could have been a trolley car\".

I remember Photozone finally getting around to testing the-then 6 year-old Nikkor 70-200 v.1 about 2 weeks before the v.2 was announced. As if he had anything to add at that point that had not already been said by a host of others.



Nov 23, 2010 at 12:24 PM
j.liam
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Zeiss 28/2 and 35/2 comparison


Who tests a lens without CRC and expects it to function in that fashion and then serves this up as the major caviat on the optic?
I can observe that my Nikkor 14-24 is a poor macro lens but the comment would be asinine and immaterial.

I remember Photozone finally getting around to testing the-then 6 year-old Nikkor 70-200 v.1 about 2 weeks before the v.2 was announced. As if he had anything to add at that point that had not already been said by a host of others.



Nov 23, 2010 at 12:22 PM





  Previous versions of j.liam's message #9065233 « Zeiss 28/2 and 35/2 comparison »

 




This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.