Here\'s the only comparison between the two I could find online. It has a mixture of other lens so you\'ll need to hover the cursor over the photos to find out where the ZE28 starts and the ZE35. Here\'s the link to the set...
Generally I like the Zeiss 28mm look more and the focal length but in these test shots that can\'t really be seen.
And here\'s a link I\'ve posted before that has a photographer behind the ZE28 that has a style that exemplifies why I like the Z*28. Has some landscape shots in there too...
But to put some things in perspective the Nikon 28/2 AIS is supposed to be a good amount of what the Zeiss 28/2 is (as far as optical prowess) at a lower price point (around $300-$400). So maybe that could be considered too? I find there\'s something special about the way Zeiss 28/2 renders though at close up to mid distance (from the photos I\'ve seen online). Admittedly the lens optical strengths (as far as subject distance) seems to lend itself to reportage style shooting.
Here\'s the only comparison between the two I could find online. It has a mixture of other lens so you\'ll need to hover the cursor over the photos to find out where the ZE28 starts and the ZE35. Here\'s the link to the set...
Generally I like the Zeiss 28mm look more and the focal length but in these test shots that can\'t really be seen.
And here\'s a link I\'ve posted before that has a photographer behind the ZE28 that has a style that exemplifies why I like the Z*28. Has some landscape shots in there too...
But to put some things in perspective the Nikon 28/2 AIS is supposed to be a good amount of what the Zeiss 28/2 is (as far as optical prowess) at a lower price point (around $300-$400). So maybe that could be considered too? I find there\'s something special about the way Zeiss 28/2 renders though at close up to mid distance (from the photos I\'ve seen online).
Nov 12, 2010 at 08:03 AM
Previous versions of bluetsunami's message #9030111 « Zeiss 28/2 and 35/2 comparison »
