From what I have read, I would agree with you. This discussion started when I was asked if the 24/2.8 I am using is MC or not. I indicated that it is and is the latest version (\"Japan\"), which does not have the preceding letters or \"MC\" on the front ring. My posts on this subject have been meant only to help others who are wondering about OM lenses and multicoating. My personal interest in OM lenses does not currently extend beyond the 24/2.8 (although I have a 50/1.8 ?also latest version).
Thanks for contributing to the knowledge base on this subject!
From what I have read, I would agree with you. This discussion started when I was asked if the 24/2.8 I am using is MC or not. I indicated that it is and is the latest version (\"Japan\"), which does not have the preceding letters or \"MC\" on the front ring. My posts on this subject have been meant only to help others who are wondering about OM lenses and multicoating. My personal interest in OM lenses does not currently extend beyond the 24/2.8 (although I have a 50/1.8 ?also latest version).
Thanks for contributing to the knowledge base on this subject!
From what I have read, I would agree with you. This discussion started when I was asked if the 24/2.8 I am using is MC or not. I indicated that it is and is the latest version (\"Japan\"), which does not have the preceding letters or \"MC\" on the front ring. My posts on this subject have been meant only to help others who are wondering about OM lenses and multicoating. My personal interest in OM lenses does not currently extend beyond the 24/2.8 (although I have a 50/1.8 ?also latest version).
Thanks for contributing to the knowledge base on this subject!
From what I have read, I would agree with you. This discussion started when I was asked if the 24/2.8 I am using is MC or not. I indicated that it is and is the latest version (\"Japan\"), which does not have the preceding letters or \"MC\" on the front ring. My posts on this subject have been meant only to help others who are wondering about OM lenses and multicoating. My personal interest in OM lenses does not currently extend beyond the 24/2.8 (although I have a 50/1.8 ?also latest version).
Thanks for contributing to the knowledge base on this subject!
From what I have read, I would agree with you. This discussion started when I was asked if the 24/2.8 I am using is MC or not. I indicated that it is and is the latest version (\"Japan\"), which does not have the preceding letters or \"MC\" on the front ring. My posts on this subject have been meant only to help others who are wondering about OM lenses and multicoating. My personal interest in OM lenses does not currently extend beyond the 24/2.8 (although I have a 50/1.8 ?also latest version).
Thanks for contributing to the knowledge base on this subject!
