Yes, that was speculation on Jerry\'s part much like Paul\'s \"40% light loss\" due to the tunneling. After all, neither has used each others\' product. But Dave (Tetrode) has done tests that proved Paul\'s theory wrong about Jerry\'s products. I\'ve seen those and I trust Dave did it unbiasedly.
You stepped in, as an Einstein user, to point out that Jerry was wrong after they had already gone 1 on 1 about \"design flaws\". I\'m not saying you intentionally came to Paul\'s rescue, but you have to admit, you\'re timing made it appear that way. I believe Jerry asked you how you\'ve tested, what procedures you took to prove that light doesn\'t leak through the vents which he said you avoided or never answered clearly. Logic tells me that some light would get through along with the heat from the modeling lamp and the fact that so many have complained about the overheating (when tilted down, as heat rises) and because Paul is recalling and redesigning the back plate, I believed that Jerry had a good point.
Jerry, to some effect, merely said the \"vents\" did the opposite of \"venting\" and instead allowed light and heat to leak through causing overheating and perhaps the missing 40ws? At least that\'s how I understood it underneath the back and forth sarcasm and ridiculing. So to me it wasn\'t creating fake drama on his part.
