E-Vener wrote:
If they didn\'t work, or worked as badly as you continually say they do -- even thug hby your own admission you\'ve never touched one, much less used one,
I don\'t think I ever stated many features do not work well or said they work badly like you say in your comment above. I will say I don\'t think that marketing a flash that has been hyped revolutionary.... That can\'t even perform as a hair light without the possibility of damage to the unit is concerning to me as someone that uses PCB products. Especially, since I can fill this thread with quotes where PCB has over and over hyped the cooling and improved modifier attachment cam design of his product.
I might even purchase some of the V3 versions of the Einstein, but I\'m not going be a beta tester like I was for the Vagabond 2.
I\'m also not sure why anybody who doesn\'t already have a collection of standard Elinchrom softboxes needs your adapter i the first place as equally good if not better softboxes are available from both Plume, ltd and Chimera.
I think many are photographers that are already invested in Elinchrom or want and Quadra and Einstein with one set of there modifiers. Why didn\'t you list PCB soft boxes as equally as good along with Plume, Chimera... I will add Larson.
racerx2oo3 wrote:
I\'m a bit surprised
I will point out Paul started this with his unsolicited review of my product which he has never used and only just saw in a web image.
I\'ve been called a Flea, a fool, poor at engineering.
I\'ve been ganged up on from the guy that wrote the review for paul that was published in a magazine that by Paul\'s own admission gives him prestigious Hot One Awards without ever even touching the product. When they inform the readers the judging in based on overall quality, innovation, design, performance, and value for the price. Sure I will ask some questions from them to elaborate on their comments
Maybe if you worked hard at building a reputation and someone as influential as Paul shot your hard word down on the WWW without a blink, you would understand... Yea, glass houses.... I dont think there is any doubt Paul lives in one.
Aug 24, 2010 at 07:52 PM
Kacey Offline [X]
Re: PLM V2's announced!
E-Vener wrote:
If they didn\'t work, or worked as badly as you continually say they do -- even thug hby your own admission you\'ve never touched one, much less used one,
I don\'t think I ever stated many features do not work well or said they work badly like you say in your comment above. I will say I don\'t think that marketing a flash that has been hyped revolutionary.... That can\'t even perform as a hair light without the possibility of damage to the unit is concerning to me as someone that uses PCB products. Especially, since I can fill this thread with quotes where PCB has over and over hyped the cooling and improved modifier attachment cam design of his product.
I might even purchase some of the V3 versions of the Einstein, but I\'m not going be a beta tester like I was for the Vagabond 2.
I\'m also not sure why anybody who doesn\'t already have a collection of standard Elinchrom softboxes needs your adapter i the first place as equally good if not better softboxes are available from both Plume, ltd and Chimera.
I think many are photographers that are already invested in Elinchrom or want and Quadra and Einstein with one set of there modifiers. Why didn\'t you list PCB soft boxes as equally as good along with Plume, Chimera... I will add Larson.
racerx2oo3 wrote:
I\'m a bit surprised
I will point out Paul started this with his unsolicited review of my product which he has never used and only just saw in a web image.
I\'ve been called a Flea, a fool, poor at engineering.
I\'ve been ganged up on from the guy that wrote the review for paul that was published in a magazine that by Paul\'s own admission gives him prestigious Hot One Awards without ever even touching the product. When they inform the readers the judging in based on overall quality, innovation, design, performance, and value for the price. Sure I will ask some questions from them to elaborate on their comments
Maybe if you worked hard at building a reputation and someone as influential as Paul shot your hard word down on the WWW you would understand... Yea, glass houses.... I dont think there is any doubt Paul lives in one.
Aug 24, 2010 at 07:51 PM
Kacey Offline [X]
Re: PLM V2's announced!
E-Vener wrote:
If they didn\'t work, or worked as badly as you continually say they do -- even thug hby your own admission you\'ve never touched one, much less used one,
I don\'t think I ever stated many features do not work well or said they work badly like you say in your comment above. I will say I don\'t think that marketing a flash that has been hyped revolutionary.... That can\'t even perform as a hair light without the possibility of damage to the unit is concerning to me as someone that uses PCB products. Especially, since I can fill this thread with quotes where PCB has over and over hyped the cooling and improved modifier attachment cam design of his product.
I might even purchase some of the V3 versions of the Einstein, but I\'m not going be a beta tester like I was for the Vagabond 2.
I\'m also not sure why anybody who doesn\'t already have a collection of standard Elinchrom softboxes needs your adapter i the first place as equally good if not better softboxes are available from both Plume, ltd and Chimera.
I think many are photographers that are already invested in Elinchrom or want and Quadra and Einstein with one set of there modifiers. Why didn\'t you list PCB soft boxes as equally as good along with Plume, Chimera... I will add Larson.
racerx2oo3 wrote:
I\'m a bit surprised
I will point out Paul started this with his unsolicited review of my product which he has never used and only just saw in a web image.
I\'ve been called a Flea, a fool, poor at engineering.
I\'ve been ganged up on from the guy that wrote the review for paul that was published in a magazine that by Paul\'s own admission gives him prestigious Hot One Awards without ever even touching the product. When they inform the readers the judging in based on overall quality, innovation, design, performance, and value for the price. Sure I will ask some questions from them to elaborate on their comments
