Re: The Lens is Not More Important Than the Camera
Lars Johnsson wrote: mttran wrote:
What is the differences between 2002 and 2010 bodies. Forget about resolution & hi iso gimmicks, somewhere 0%->5% range or maybe the other way around in IQ. Imo, latest bodies got way overrated. Well, better save for lenses.
If you look at it the other way: What is the differences between 2002 and 2010 lenses probably a lot less than the bodies
Lars, not many people has the luxury lenses you have now... What i meant is...from \"non-L\" to \"L\" lens is better than from X to XMarkY body. Well, he/she can improve the IQ from Peter\'s steps 1,2 &3 alone without buying anything beside market value of the lenses seem much better in return than the bodies.
Body upgrade has more sense when we move across its sensor boundaries (1.6-> 1.3 -> 1.0) or our set has hit the IQ mark and we want something 10% better.
Aug 14, 2010 at 02:26 AM
Previous versions of mttran's message #8750432 « The Lens is Not More Important Than the Camera »
probably a lot less than the bodies
beside market value of the lenses seem much better in return than the bodies.