Has anybody considered that the \"D90 Replacement\" may actually replace both the D90 and the D300s (which would explain why that one received such a minimal upgrade). Then the specs would make sense, and the price as well i construction ran somewhere in-between. Essentially it would remove the D300 as a \"mistake\" and leave the magnesium, weather sealed bodies and full-frame sensors as the \"pro\" lineup.
Jul 24, 2010 at 03:14 PM
Previous versions of hlavo's message #8688801 « what'll this mean for future FX cameras? »
