Bifurcator! Thanks a lot for such a prompt service! Do you do childrens parties too?
Only if there\'s a sexy mommy involved!
The OOF highlights render really very nicely! Yummy. Now I have to rethink my \"which tessar to get\" strategy once more. (there\'s also the 12-blade chrome versions ... though I hardly see anyone posting images shot with those, which could mean something). WIkipedia places the (first) design of the tessar in 1902 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tessar) ... so it goes way back!
Yeah, probably true. I think I remember reading that the 45mm 2.8 here was designed first in the 50\'s tho.
Oh ah the GIF frames were 1:1 taken from RAW ... well that\'s why I said \"seems soft\" - when you put up the processed & scaled image I didn\'t see no softness, great! At which aperture was that shot btw? Wide open?
No that was the 5.6 sample but it wouldn\'t matter at that size. I keep repeating myself here saying that no one can tell anything at all from scaled images like typically are posted here. I can use the crappiest lens I have and match the IQ of any lens in existence at these sizes after a little PP - and no one will know the difference. I guess everyone already knows it but I say it anyway.
thanks again bifurcator!
Piotr: very nices images! #4 is my fav of this series. wow.
cheers,
h.
NP, you\'re welcome. Here\'s a few more from the same lens:
100% Crop (processed).
Jul 14, 2010 at 07:36 AM
Previous versions of Bifurcator's message #8656896 « C/Y Zeiss Image Post »
I guess everyone already knows it but I say it anyway. 
