fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of yauyi's message #8571988 « 5D2 looks "digital" compare to 5D? »

  

yauyi
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
5D2 looks "digital" compare to 5D?


gdanmitchell wrote:
I won\'t provide a link here - no sense creating the idea that this is all a dastardly plot to make you visit my site - but if you happen to find my gallery and look through it (keeping in mind that you are viewing small jpgs that I prefer to show as much larger prints) you could have some fun by seeing if you can pick out which are done on a 5D and which on a 5D2 and finding some that were done with a completely different camera or two.

And, seriously, please don\'t look for or visit the site if you are going to post about the \"traffic\" business. I guess if it ticks too many people off I\'ll just delete this post.

If you live in the SF Bay Area we might arrange for you to compare prints and try your luck at identifying the camera...

(The camera info is easy to find directly, and you could obviously make some assumptions based on dates, but don\'t ruin your fun by taking that route, OK?)

Dan


Dan, nice gallery, and I have seen some of your work in the past, but honestly I can\'t tell which one were taken from which camera without checking out the exif(if it\'s there), that\'s the reason why I started the thread originally and asked people to show me what and where to look for these organic characteristics. I suppose I can rent a 5D to see for myself, but thought I asked in the forum first, since i know there are a lot more people who have used both of them in the past and they may have something to show, but so far nobody is able to give any direct comparison.



Jun 15, 2010 at 02:39 PM
yauyi
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: 5D2 looks "digital" compare to 5D?


gdanmitchell wrote:
I won\'t provide a link here - no sense creating the idea that this is all a dastardly plot to make you visit my site - but if you happen to find my gallery and look through it (keeping in mind that you are viewing small jpgs that I prefer to show as much larger prints) you could have some fun by seeing if you can pick out which are done on a 5D and which on a 5D2 and finding some that were done with a completely different camera or two.

And, seriously, please don\'t look for or visit the site if you are going to post about the \"traffic\" business. I guess if it ticks too many people off I\'ll just delete this post.

If you live in the SF Bay Area we might arrange for you to compare prints and try your luck at identifying the camera...

(The camera info is easy to find directly, and you could obviously make some assumptions based on dates, but don\'t ruin your fun by taking that route, OK?)

Dan


Dan, nice gallery, and I have seen some of your work in the past, but honestly I can\'t tell which one were taken from which camera without checking out the exif(if it\'s there), that\'s the reason why I started the thread originally and asked people to show me what and where to look for these organic characteristics....



Jun 15, 2010 at 02:32 PM





  Previous versions of yauyi's message #8571988 « 5D2 looks "digital" compare to 5D? »