fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of gdanmitchell's message #8567815 « 5D2 looks "digital" compare to 5D? »

  

gdanmitchell
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: 5D2 looks "digital" compare to 5D?


veroman wrote:
gdanmitchell wrote:
.... my position is that it doesn\'t matter in any intrinsic way what technology you use to create photographs as long as the photographs you create represent your version of what photographs should look like. Why is (supposedly) looking like film a good thing? Dan


Because film is analog and is the root of all photography. It\'s the standard of reference for what a technically good or great photograph should look like. There are definitely lingering problems with digital...


To point #1 I say, \"So?\"

To point #2 I say, \"And there are no \'lingering problems\' with film?\"

Dan



Jun 14, 2010 at 11:17 AM





  Previous versions of gdanmitchell's message #8567815 « 5D2 looks "digital" compare to 5D? »