pjbishop wrote:
I don\'t see why discussing perceived differences has to seen as advocacy. The 5D and 5DII are different cameras. The 5D has bigger pixels; the 5DII has more pixels. Some of us think that we can discern a different look or feel in the respective products of the two cameras, not necessarily in terms of superiority, just differences. Both cameras are capable of producing excellent results. Of course, the II yields more detail, good for very large prints, and has more contrast. I think the II\'s color is more accurate, too. On the other hand, I think that the Classic\'s big pixels give a more refined tonal response than the II\'s. We enjoy discussing this stuff.
Actually, they are the same size. The 5D2 has less wasted space.
Jun 14, 2010 at 10:44 AM
Previous versions of RDKirk's message #8567701 « 5D2 looks "digital" compare to 5D? »
