charlesk wrote: jxsq wrote:
The 1D provides AF good enough for most user\'s needs, 5d does not.
The 1D provides speed good enough for most user\'s needs, 5d does not.
The 1D provides builds good enough for most user\'s needs, 5d does not.
Maybe if the users you deal with happen to be the staff of Sports Illustrated.
In the real world of real users, the 5D is a far superior camera in most respects.
You didn\'t get it at all.
I am trying to show that in your logic, the 5d is also dated technology, but strangely enough you are still using it.
I like 5d, for its image quality. I think it is a special machine by itself.
But unlike you, i am not go to 5d\'s thread and flood it with words like \'obsolete\', silly\', or whatever.
And are you a better photographer than the ones at Sports Illustrated? Is there anything wrong with those people? Are they live in virtual world, or are they virtual human beings?
