fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of denoir's message #8293661 « 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II Master thread »

  

denoir
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II Master thread


DigLLoyd is full of it. Now I can understand if he reserved judgement and said that he would test another sample, but to try to get attention by claiming it\'s a design fault.. Well, it would seem that Ken Rockwell has a competitor...

Anyway, test at 58 m (distance measured with a Leica DISTO D5), 200mm, 100% crops:


All shot raw and processed the same way in lightroom. Cropped and labeled in photoshop.

If you want to check the unprocessed RAWs yourself you can download them here (~170 MB zip file).



Mar 28, 2010 at 09:20 AM
denoir
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II Master thread


DigLLoyd is full of it. Now I can understand if he reserved judgement and said that he would test another sample, but to try to get attention by claiming it\'s a design fault.. Well, it would seem that Ken Rockwell has a competitor...

Anyway, test at 58 m (distance measured with a Leica DISTO D7), 200mm, 100% crops:


All shot raw and processed the same way in lightroom. Cropped and labeled in photoshop.

If you want to check the unprocessed RAWs yourself you can download them here (~170 MB zip file).



Mar 28, 2010 at 09:19 AM
denoir
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II Master thread


DigLLoyd is full of it. Now I can understand if he reserved judgement and said that he would test another sample, but to try to get attention by claiming it\'s a design fault.. Well, it would seem that Ken Rockwell has a competitor...

Anyway, test at 58 m (distance measured with a Leica DISTO D5), 200mm, 100% crops:


All shot raw and processed the same way in lightroom. Cropped and labeled in photoshop.

If you want to check the unprocessed RAWs yourself you can download them here (~170 MB zip file).



Mar 28, 2010 at 09:17 AM
denoir
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II Master thread


DigLLoyd is full of it. Now I can understand if he reserved judgement and said that he would test another sample, but to try to get attention by claiming it\'s a design fault.. Well, it would seem that Ken Rockwell has a competitor...

Anyway, test at 58 m (distance measured with a Leica DISTO D5), 200mm:


All shot raw and processed the same way in lightroom. Cropped and labeled in photoshop.

If you want to check the unprocessed RAWs yourself you can download them here (~170 MB zip file).



Mar 28, 2010 at 09:11 AM





  Previous versions of denoir's message #8293661 « 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II Master thread »