jprisching wrote:
Why not take him at his word and that he did not think the Mark IV was that impressive... And he liked the file quality of the D3.
Because some intrepid web sleuths had uncovered the fact that Mr. Jorgen had already registered the www.nikonfieldreviews.com web domain as early as December 2009. That\'s long before he ever got his hands on a 1D Mark IV. It\'s obvious had already been orchestrating some kind of excuse to switch brands many months before he even got to test the 1D Mark IV against the Nikon D3s.
It\'s clear that Nikon simply poached him from Canon. They bribe him with free gear, and got him to switch brands. And now all the people who visited canonfieldreviews.com will be re-directed to nikonfieldreviews.com. Brilliant PR move by Nikon. That\'s not the first time Nikon has done this.
The most damning evidence is Mr.Jorgen\'s intent to eventually remove all traces of his glowing Canon reviews from his website. A neutral party wouldn\'t even think about doing that. But that\'s exactly what a sponsored \"reviewer\" would be obligated to do.
jprisching wrote:
Why not take him at his word and that he did not think the Mark IV was that impressive... And he liked the file quality of the D3.
Because some intrepid web sleuths had uncovered the fact that Mr. Jorgen had already registered the www.nikonfieldreviews.com web domain as early as December 2009. That\'s loooong before he got his hands on a 1D Mark IV. And then he claims Canon\'s inability to provide him a 1Dmk4 this spring for drove him to Nikon when, in fact, he had already been planning the switch many months in advance. The whole thing looks orchestrated.
It seems obvious to me that Nikon simply poached him from Canon. They bribe him with free gear, and got him to switch brands. And now all the people who visited canonfieldreviews.com will be re-directed to nikonfieldreviews.com. Brilliant PR move by Nikon.
The most damning evidence is his intent to eventually remove all traces of his glowing Canon reviews from his website. A neutral party wouldn\'t even think about doing that. But that\'s exactly what a sponsored \"reviewer\" would be obligated to do.
The whole thing is a sham. Some intrepid web sleuths had uncovered the fact that Mr. Jorgen had already registered the www.nikonfieldreviews.com web domain as early as December 2009. Now he\'s blaming Canon\'s inability to provide him a 1Dmk4 this spring for driving him to Nikon when, in fact, he had already been planning the switch many months in advance.
It seems obvious to me that Nikon simply poached him from Canon. They bribe him with free gear, and got him to switch brands. And now all the people who visited canonfieldreviews.com will be re-directed to nikonfieldreviews.com. Brilliant PR move by Nikon.
The most damning evidence is his intent to eventually remove all traces of his glowing Canon reviews from his website. A neutral party wouldn\'t even think about doing that. But that\'s exactly what a sponsored \"reviewer\" would be obligated to do.
Mar 27, 2010 at 01:36 AM
Previous versions of stargazer78's message #8289612 « Ole Jorgen moves to Nikon »
