Why do you assume that I am assuming that. Maybe I am merely sticking up for a group of individuals who I work closely with and happen to be a part of, and know that people who don\'t work with them don\'t know them, and therefore shouldn\'t hold judgment.
But, if you would like me to defend myself, please, let me refer you to pg 4 post#24where Pietro Brezzo aka iggyfenton refers to my comments as being elitist.
You said: \"You all want to sit back and call us a bunch of elitiss and in the same breath you ask how to get credentialed on the sidelines with us.\"
When you use the word \"us\" that automatically includes yourself. Thus, I asked why you assume anyone here is referring to you in the first place. If you are not an elitist photog, then you are not part of the group that is being questioned.
Ahhhh! back to the grind.
Well, Rob, you need to be a little more clear in your comments then, as well as read my responses a little better before posting what you think is a good rebuttal.
See in your first post, you use the word YOU, meaning me specifically. My reply to that was that you were assuming I was thinking it was all about me, when in fact I wasn\'t. I took the comments as such, and being directed towards a group of individuals who I was a part of. Then finally in cool little response, you simply reiterated what I had already said, that I was including myself in that group because I am a professional shooter and the comments are being generalized towards professional shooters.
So, Rob, please do me a favour and feel free to correct yourself at any point.
Did, you mean to say that I was taking these comments as a personal attack and there thinking it was always about me as you said in your first post. Or, As I said in my reply and you so graciously echoed in your snide response, am I part of said elitist group and simply defending us as a whole.
Mar 22, 2010 at 07:38 AM
Previous versions of Rick Denham's message #8269887 « Photo Credentials. Why? »
