Nill Toulme wrote:
What makes me think I\'m missing something is the difference in his findings between the 1DsMkII and the MkIV — both 16MP bodies.
Both 16MP bodies but different sensor sizes.
I don\'t understand how the difference in crop factor alone could lead to that much of a difference — two stops worth! — in perception of motion blur.
The greater the crop factor the greater the magnification and the higher the MP count the greater the magnification when viewed at 100% on a computer monitor. If you understand why a longer focal length requires a higher shutter speed to get a clear shot, then you understand this because it\'s basically the same thing. The more you magnify the greater the impact of even small movements.
Mar 12, 2010 at 03:27 PM
Previous versions of ken.berry's message #8233287 « Pixel density and motion blur »
