Pixel Perfect wrote:
The moon may not be a good subject to test the res differences in FL limited cases. Getting a good shot is very dependent on seeing conditions and if they are not good, any advantage one has may be significantly decreased.
Whatever the conditions the 7D is showing more detail, very much so with fine structure.
Hi Wayne, etal,
I agree that using the moon is a dicey choice for making a comparison, as well. Short of shooting from the vacuum of outer space any celestial imaging will be subject to atmospheric disturbance. Is it possible to make a comparison of optics and/or sensors under good seeing conditions...of course it is. But, due to my own photographic dealings with the instantaneous changeability of the atmosphere, I, personally, would shy away from using such images as my evidence.
My two cents...
Jimmy G
Feb 20, 2010 at 10:10 PM
Previous versions of jimmy462's message #8157319 « Take 2: 5D2 150% vs 7D 100% »
