thedigitalbean wrote:You\'re the one who brought up the value proposition of the D300s to the D3s, not me.
Sorry but we are not here to play \"You are first said\" game as well as not right person been picked by you to playl...
As for comparing the D3s to the 1D4, yes they are optimized for different types of shooters
So, you are agreeing that comparing crop camera to FF is a bit incorrect? Why it is Canon problem that Nikon doesn\'t have 1.3 crop or higher mpx sensor? Also it is bluffing saying that 1DsIII will not destroy any Nikon/Sony made sensor in IQ comparison or reminds me clear Nikon fan-boyish behavior, but than what are you doing here with all your jumps and attitude on Canon users?
thedigitalbean wrote:You\'re the one who brought up the value proposition of the D300s to the D3s, not me.
Sorry but we are not in Mumbai to play \"You are first said\" game here as well as not right person been picked by you to play as well...
As for comparing the D3s to the 1D4, yes they are optimized for different types of shooters
So, you are agreeing that comparing crop camera to FF is a bit incorrect? Why it is Canon problem that Nikon doesn\'t have 1.3 crop or higher mpx sensor? Also it is bluffing saying that 1DsIII will not destroy any Nikon/Sony made sensor in IQ comparison or reminds me clear Nikon fan-boyish behavior, but than what are you doing here with all your jumps and attitude on Canon users?
thedigitalbean wrote:You\'re the one who brought up the value proposition of the D300s to the D3s, not me.
Sorry but we are not in Mumbai to play \"You are first said\" game here as well as not right person bin picked by you to play as well...
As for comparing the D3s to the 1D4, yes they are optimized for different types of shooters
So, you are agreeing that comparing crop camera to FF is a bit incorrect? Why it is Canon problem that Nikon doesn\'t have 1.3 crop or higher mpx sensor? Also it is bluffing saying that 1DsIII will not destroy any Nikon/Sony made sensor in IQ comparison or reminds me clear Nikon fan-boyish behavior, but than what are you doing here with all your jumps and attitude on Canon users?
So, you are agreeing that comparing crop camera to FF is a bit incorrect? Why it is Canon problem that Nikon doesn\'t have 1.3 crop or higher mpx sensor? Also it is bluffing saying that 1DsIII will not destroy any Nikon/Sony made sensor in IQ comparison or reminds me clear Nikon fan-boyish behavior, but than what are you doing here with all your jumps and attitude on Canon users?
thedigitalbean wrote: Breitling65 wrote: thedigitalbean wrote
I have actually used both bodies,
You could even actually use any camera body in the world, why should it cost anything here on Canon forum?
You\'re the one who brought up the value proposition of the D300s to the D3s, not me.
Though I suspect you aren\'t really interested in a dialog in comparing those
bodies and likely made your comment in a childish attempt to rile me up.
Wow, that is really aggressive now I would like to know \"adult\" explanation (without fps talks) why wouldn’t any of the famous Nikon paid reviewers ever compared IQ of D3 or S or non S to 1Ds mk III as FF camera to FF camera? Or just wait 2-3 month to get real competitor in place (1DsmkIV) and review after?
Well since I am not a paid reviewer, nor do I personally know any paid reviewers I can\'t claim to know their motivations.
I can tell you that I have compared the D3 directly to a 1Ds3 and to a 5D2 IQ wise and have not been shy in making my observations known (i.e. in term of per unit area noise the 5D2 and D3 are equivalent with the 5D2 having more detail easily up to ISO 1600). Now the fact that no one cares enough about my opinions to pay me as a reviewer, well thats their problem
As for comparing the D3s to the 1D4, yes they are optimized for different types of shooters (the D3s for the low light nut, the 1D4 for the focal length limited shooter), however, IMO Canon invites comparison when these two cameras are so closely priced to each other and released at virtually the same time.
I fully suspect the 1Ds4 will have a per unit area noise levels about 1 stop better than the 5D2 and will likely also come in at 32mp. It will also likely have a > $8k pricetag, thus inviting comparisons to the D3x (or its replacement) rather than the D3s.
So, you are agree that comparing crop camera to FF is a bit incorrect? Why it is Canon problem that Nikon doesn\'t have 1.3 crop? Also it is bluffing saying that 1DsIII will not thrush any Nikon/Sony made sensor in IQ comparison or reminds me clear Nikon fan-boyish behavior, but than what are you doing here with all your jumps and attitude on Canon users?
thedigitalbean wrote: Breitling65 wrote: thedigitalbean wrote
I have actually used both bodies,
You could even actually use any camera body in the world, why should it cost anything here on Canon forum?
You\'re the one who brought up the value proposition of the D300s to the D3s, not me.
Though I suspect you aren\'t really interested in a dialog in comparing those
bodies and likely made your comment in a childish attempt to rile me up.
Wow, that is really aggressive now I would like to know \"adult\" explanation (without fps talks) why wouldn’t any of the famous Nikon paid reviewers ever compared IQ of D3 or S or non S to 1Ds mk III as FF camera to FF camera? Or just wait 2-3 month to get real competitor in place (1DsmkIV) and review after?
Well since I am not a paid reviewer, nor do I personally know any paid reviewers I can\'t claim to know their motivations.
I can tell you that I have compared the D3 directly to a 1Ds3 and to a 5D2 IQ wise and have not been shy in making my observations known (i.e. in term of per unit area noise the 5D2 and D3 are equivalent with the 5D2 having more detail easily up to ISO 1600). Now the fact that no one cares enough about my opinions to pay me as a reviewer, well thats their problem
As for comparing the D3s to the 1D4, yes they are optimized for different types of shooters (the D3s for the low light nut, the 1D4 for the focal length limited shooter), however, IMO Canon invites comparison when these two cameras are so closely priced to each other and released at virtually the same time.
I fully suspect the 1Ds4 will have a per unit area noise levels about 1 stop better than the 5D2 and will likely also come in at 32mp. It will also likely have a > $8k pricetag, thus inviting comparisons to the D3x (or its replacement) rather than the D3s.
Feb 17, 2010 at 04:54 AM
Previous versions of Breitling65's message #8143077 « RG on 1D Mk IV autofocus performance »