Garylv wrote: M Vers wrote:
Questioning RG\'s possible ties to Nikon, fiscal or otherwise, is outlandish?
No, not at all. I can\'t believe how widely you missed the point. That wasn\'t the point at all. It\'s the big conspiracy theory to trash Canon. That\'s what people are insinuating, directly and indirectly.
Wow...Talk about missing the point..
The point is not that a huge conspiracy (implying multiple individuals) is out to trash Canon, the point is that regardless of whether the report is ultimately true or false, a single man/individual presented potentially misleading (and certainly no comparative proof to the contrary exists on his site) in what is easily construed as an unprofessional way. Information that in all probability will unfairly lead to negative connotations and uncertainty.
It takes some real effort to miss that huge, easy to spot, flashing neon sign, point, but some here manage to do it... repeatedly...
Feb 15, 2010 at 06:48 PM
Previous versions of jamesf99's message #8137098 « RG on 1D Mk IV autofocus performance »
