Jeff wrote:
Since this thread has leveled accusations of \'impartial objectivity\' at RG, how does the fact that Phil never even reviewed the 1D MkIII work into it? Can anyone think of a single DSLR that DPR didn\'t review?
I\'m honestly not keeping track, so the question isn\'t necessarily rhetorical...
\"And for those still discussing the 1DIII\'s lack of review - our failure to review it was nothing to do with any relationship between Phil and Canon, it was because dpreview was moving office, employing and training new staff, during one of the busiest periods of DSLR releases ever. Work was done on a 1DIII review (I\'ve shot over 1000 would-be gallery images with it), but by the time we had an opportunity to review it, it\'d been on the market for almost a year and everything likely to be said about it had already been said. That is the one and only reason.\"
Feb 15, 2010 at 06:35 PM
Previous versions of thw2's message #8137061 « RG on 1D Mk IV autofocus performance »
