I believe Rob reported his findings accurately based on how HE uses the camera. Which could be much different than how you or I use the camera. Everyone has their own shooting techniques and people will report varying results. It happens with every camera.
Then shouldn\'t he be honest and objective enough to put his hands up and say that the AF \"problems\" he\'s experiencing might well be down to him and not the camera?
He lays the blame for the Mk IV\'s poor performance in his hands squarely at Canon\'s door, and it\'s this - this ambiguity and lack of discipline in how he\'s reporting his conclusions - that leaves the review open to speculation and RG open to possible criticism.
As I\'ve said, whether or not he\'s out to do Canon down on Nikon\'s behalf, the article certainly supports that kind of conclusion - and that\'s his own fault.
Feb 15, 2010 at 12:06 PM
Previous versions of keithreeder's message #8135634 « RG on 1D Mk IV autofocus performance »
