But why? Is there any proof that Canon lenses are inferior to these other companies?
I was being trollish in my comments, but I think there\'s just a romantic notion that there\'s some \"Zeiss magic\" or \"Lieca look\" which I think is just BS
Is there any objective tests to show that lenses from these manufacturers do outperform lenses from Canon/Nikon on a systematic basis?
I find it hard to believe that Canon, a multi billion dollar conglomerate with one of the biggest R&D budgets in the world and the very latest in optical technology innovation is unable to match offerings from relatively small companies like Leica or Zeiss on a systematic basis
Feb 10, 2010 at 01:27 AM
Previous versions of Dawei Ye's message #8114195 « New Nikkor lenses »
