telyt wrote: Bifurcator wrote:
I already drank mine.
I see you edited your message:
\"the fact remains that you were hand holding a 25mm lens @ 3 times the shutter speed of the FL. Thrice was handholding at appx 1:1 (1/80 vs. 100mm).\"
One the angle offsets are identical. Meaning the camera exact same amount of camera movement will cause the exact same amount of blur given the same SS and the same effective focal length. That\'s just math.
And then, you still misread the original messages. His was 1/180s and mine was 1/80s not the other way around as you presume.
Good try though.
By continuing this line of reasoning you are making a very convincing demonstration of your comparison skills.
Well, if I\'m getting something wrong please be kind enough to explain what it is and how to correct it.
RustyBug wrote:
OIC ... I thought you had said they were the same (I \'assumed a typo on the 180 vs. 80). On re-read, I see that you were saying \'same\' for hand held, i.e. not same for 1/80.
So that makes the delta 3.2:1 vs. 1.8:1
Why would the shutter speed change the aperture size? And it\'s 1:3.2 vs. 1:2. Huh? what are you talking about. Please explain.
telyt wrote: Bifurcator wrote:
I already drank mine.
I see you edited your message:
\"the fact remains that you were hand holding a 25mm lens @ 3 times the shutter speed of the FL. Thrice was handholding at appx 1:1 (1/80 vs. 100mm).\"
One the angle offsets are identical. Meaning the camera exact same amount of camera movement will cause the exact same amount of blur given the same SS and the same effective focal length. That\'s just math.
And then, you still misread the original messages. His was 1/180s and mine was 1/80s not the other way around as you presume.
Good try though.
By continuing this line of reasoning you are making a very convincing demonstration of your comparison skills.
Well, if I\'m getting something wrong please be kind enough to explain what it is and how to correct it.
Feb 06, 2010 at 01:33 PM
Previous versions of Bifurcator's message #8098854 « Leica 100mm APO macro - hard to beat »
